对于饭饭的这个总结:( 1)在非限制性定语修饰名词,被修饰名词和修饰词之间有介词短语酱紫滴结构间隔的时候,V-ing结构做非限制性定语修饰的“跳跃能力”要强于which引导的非限制性定语从句,就是说这个时候V-ing结构的非限制性定语更具有效性。我不太同意: 3)SVO,V-ing [R1]修饰谓语,句子 verb modifier or clause modifier (相当于副词adverbial modifier, modifies the entire action of the precedingclause and applies to the subject within that clause. ) 例子 OG12-1 The Glass House Mountains in Queensland, Australia,were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook, by whom they were named supposedly because its sheer wet rocks glistened like glass. 其中的C: naming them supposedly since theirOG解释错误原因是as the the object of a preposition and not the subject of the clause, James Cook does not work as the noun that verbal phrase beginning with naming can describe
I lifted the weight, whistling 。(仅仅表示同时发生的一个动作)OG11-24 /12-30For members of theseventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with woodenframes were essential items of military equipment, a method to protectwarriors against enemy arrows and spears. A. a method to protect B. as a method protecting C. Protecting (C )D. as a protection of E. to protect 有童鞋( 我也是。。) 可能认为protecting 是修饰items 或equipment, 但是"svo comma v-ing" 必须是verb modifier !OG 对此的解释是 revealing the purpose of the items. 体会下为什么不说modify the items of military equipment? 因此protecting 是 adv, 表目的。修饰句子往往表示由被修饰句子引起的结果,这种情况,ing 结尾不存在问题Crime has recently decreased,leading to... TIPS:nounmodifier 必须满足touch ruleVerbmodifer位置比较宽松,放在句首、句尾都可,但一定要applies to thesubjectopen to discuss-- by 会员 Royzhang0929 (2012/2/15 11:06:40)
Roy亲~先谢谢roy的tips的补充及讨论拓展~~ 但是饭饭木有明白亲不同意在那里。。。这个。。。including饭饭一直是遵照prep语法笔记讲述视为介词短语,此处拿来和some of which比较也是出于修饰的名词~~ 但是看亲的驳斥立足是基于V-ing结构做状语修饰谓语动词和主句~~饭饭这里刚刚经baby姐姐指教拓展思维从状语角度考虑~~还在思忖学习Ing~~ 之前结论是基于介词短语修饰名词考虑~~不知道亲是否是和饭饭基于一点出发进行驳斥?
还有那个protecting的题。。。。饭饭之前会的。。。。就是看了OG解释为目的昨天就又纠结了to protect为什么不行,既然都是表目的,句子还是主系表结构,主语和表语属性一致。这样to protect在这种情况下,相对于protecting,不是更少滴造成歧义么。。。。看了看bat滴神贴。。。感悟了一点。。。。现在在继续想。。。sigh 补充一点啊:这个to protect饭饭后来是从动作发出者不符合逻辑来排除的~~~正在思维确认ing~~一个自我说服的过程! |