ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7197|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd6-24, 25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-20 23:46:00 | 只看该作者

gwd6-24, 25


Q23 to Q26:


      Diamonds are almost impos-


       sible to detect directly because they


       are so rare:  very rich kimberlite


Line       pipes, the routes through which


  (5)       diamonds rise, may contain only


three carats of diamonds per ton


of kimberlite.  Kimberlite begins as


magma in Earth’s mantle (the layer


between the crust and the core).  As


(10)      the magma smashes through layers


of rock, it rips out debris, creating


a mix of liquid and solid material.


Some of the solid material it brings


up may come from a so-called


(15)      diamond-stability field, where condi-


tions of pressure and temperature


are conducive to the formation of


diamonds.  If diamonds are to sur-


vive, though, they must shoot toward


(20)      Earth’s surface quickly.  Otherwise,


       they revert to graphite or burn.


       Explorers seeking diamonds look


for specks of “indicator minerals”


peculiar to the mantle but carried up


(25)      in greater quantities than diamonds


and eroded out of kimberlite pipes


into the surrounding land.  The stan-


dard ones are garnets, chromites,


and ilmenites.  One can spend years


(30)      searching for indicators and tracing


them back to the pipes that are their


source; however, 90 percent of


       kimberlite pipes found this way are


barren of diamonds, and the rest


(35)     are usually too sparse to mine.


      In the 1970’s the process of


locating profitable pipes was refined


by focusing on the subtle differ-


ences between the chemical


(40)     signatures of indicator minerals


found in diamond-rich pipes as


opposed to those found in barren


pipes.  For example, G10 garnets,


a type of garnet typically found in


(45)      diamond-rich pipes, are lower in


calcium and higher in chrome than


garnets from barren pipes.  Geo-


chemists John Gurney showed that


garnets with this composition were


(50)      formed only in the diamond-stability


field; more commonly found ver-


sions came from elsewhere in the


mantle.  Gurney also found that


though ilmenites did not form in the


(55)      diamond-stability field, there was a


link useful for prospectors:  when


the iron in ilmenite was highly


oxidized, its source pipe rarely


contained any diamonds.  He rea-


(60)      soned that iron took on more or less


oxygen in response to conditions in


the kimberlitic magma itself—mainly


in response to heat and the avail-


able oxygen.  When iron became


(65)      highly oxidized, so did diamonds;


that is, they vaporized into carbon


dioxide.



Q24:


Each of the following is mentioned in the passage as a difference between G10 garnet and other versions of garnet EXCEPT


              



  • level of oxidation

  • commonness of occurrence

  • chemical signature

  • place of formation

  • appearance in conjunction with diamonds


  • Q25:


    The passage suggests that the presence of G10 garnet in a kimberlite pipe indicates that


                  



  • the pipe in which the garnet is found has a 90% chance of containing diamonds

  • the levels of calcium and chrome in the pipe are conducive to diamond formation

  • the pipe passed through a diamond-stability field and thus may contain diamonds

  • any diamonds the pipe contains would not have come from the diamond-stability field

  • the pipe’s temperature was so high that it oxidized any diamonds the pipe might have contained

  • 为什么Q24 选A, Q选B? 谢谢.


    沙发
    发表于 2004-8-21 04:11:00 | 只看该作者

    24 、In the 1970’s the process of locating profitable pipes was refined by focusing on the subtle differences between the chemical signatures of indicator minerals found in diamond-rich pipes as opposed to those found in barren pipes.

    For example, G10 garnets,a type of garnet typically found indiamond-rich pipes, are lower in calcium and higher in chrome than garnets from barren pipes

    1. level of oxidation
    2. commonness of occurrence
    3. chemical signature
    4. place of formation
    5. appearance in conjunction with diamonds

    c就不用说了吧。时间紧的话我读完文章这题就直接选a了,感觉这题要单个定位还真不好做。另外就是whenthe iron in ilmenite was highly oxidized, its source pipe rarely contained any diamonds说明a的内容不是提干要的,就是答案。

    25题的答案也在上面引用原文的话里(英文),自己体会一下。

    板凳
    发表于 2004-8-21 23:14:00 | 只看该作者

      最近好多次见到"gwd" , 那究竟是什么东东呢?? 我很菜的.

    地板
    发表于 2005-8-14 10:15:00 | 只看该作者

    我觉得24题的定位应该是这样更准确一点点吧:)


    Each of the following is mentioned in the passage as a difference between G10(定位依据) garnet and other versions of garnet EXCEPT


               


    A.   level of oxidation (从定位来看不是讨论G10这种东西的地方)


    B.    commonness of occurrence (more commonly found versions came from elsewhere in the mantle)


    C.   chemical signature (lower in calcium and higher in chrome than garnets from barren pipes)


    D.   place of formation (John Gurney showed that garnets with this composition were formed only in the diamond-stability field)


    E.    appearance in conjunction with diamonds (G10 garnets, a type of garnet typically found in diamond-rich pipes)

    5#
    发表于 2005-9-26 00:06:00 | 只看该作者

    我对A,E有疑问。


    (1)关于E,用原文的话:G10 garnets, a type of garnet typically found in diamond-rich pipes 来定位appearance in conjunction with diamonds ,怎么感觉好像好牵强啊。因为appearance就是表面就看见什么东东就能判断它是否有钻石。。。。可是原文并没有提及啊。我感觉E是无关选项。


    (2)我对A的理解是:oxidation 多,钻石就少。所以level of oxidation可以判断钻石的多少。


    请NN指正!



    6#
    发表于 2005-10-9 01:04:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用mmfoolish在2005-9-26 0:06:00的发言:

    我对A,E有疑问。


    (1)关于E,用原文的话:G10 garnets, a type of garnet typically found in diamond-rich pipes 来定位appearance in conjunction with diamonds ,怎么感觉好像好牵强啊。因为appearance就是表面就看见什么东东就能判断它是否有钻石。。。。可是原文并没有提及啊。我感觉E是无关选项。


    (2)我对A的理解是:oxidation 多,钻石就少。所以level of oxidation可以判断钻石的多少。


    请NN指正!




    题目问:Each of the following is mentioned in the passage as a difference between G10 garnet and other versions of garnet EXCEPT


    文章二段的后半部分提到ilmenites时才提到oxidized,二段前半部分提到G10的时候根本没提到oxidized,所以不可能是A


    你认为A,那是一种infer,不是mention


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-9 1:04:28编辑过]
    7#
    发表于 2007-4-2 22:47:00 | 只看该作者
    可E也没提到啊?appearance in conjunction with diamonds直接翻译就是“跟钻石结合起来的样子”,原文跟本都没有涉及啊?这个不是问钻石的位置啊?疑惑中。。。
    8#
    发表于 2007-10-4 13:30:00 | 只看该作者
    i have the same question as floor 7th, any NN can help, please~~
    9#
    发表于 2008-2-12 06:32:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用我爱宝宝在2004-8-21 4:11:00的发言:

    24 、In the 1970’s the process of locating profitable pipes was refined by focusing on the subtle differences between the chemical signatures of indicator minerals found in diamond-rich pipes as opposed to those found in barren pipes.

    For example, G10 garnets,a type of garnet typically found indiamond-rich pipes, are lower in calcium and higher in chrome than garnets from barren pipes

    1. level of oxidation
    2. commonness of occurrence
                  
    3. chemical signature
    4. place of formation
    5. appearance in conjunction with diamonds

    c就不用说了吧。时间紧的话我读完文章这题就直接选a了,感觉这题要单个定位还真不好做。另外就是whenthe iron in ilmenite was highly oxidized, its source pipe rarely contained any diamonds说明a的内容不是提干要的,就是答案。

    25题的答案也在上面引用原文的话里(英文),自己体会一下。

    同感,这种单独要定位的题目不多,但是非常耗时,Tricky也很多,不好对付。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 20:05
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部