ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payout on car-theft claims has been larger than the company can afford to sustain. Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing such devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3804|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教,PREP2007cr2_第20题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-5 13:09:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
20.(27836-!-item-!-188;#058&003666)



During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payout on car-theft claims has been larger than the company can afford to sustain.Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way.Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing such devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.



In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



(A) The first and the second are both evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion.

(B) The first presents a problem a response to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached by that assessment.

(C) The first is the position the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses to support that position.

(D) The first is a development that the argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes in support of the explanation it offers.

(E) The first presents a development whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is a judgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome.



答案为B ,不太理解the second is the judgment reached by that assessment. 不知道这个assessment究竟是什么?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-2-9 22:28:58 | 只看该作者
这个assessment就是Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way。作者assess这个公司不能减少政策,所以它无法因这种政策带来的payouts
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-10 10:45:37 | 只看该作者
谢谢,隔几天之后再看,觉得Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way是一个problem,而argument整体是来评估解决这一问题的一种方法的(给装防盗器的用户打折),第二个黑体是评估后得出的判断——确实会减少理赔支出。不知理解的对不对?
一口气做完PREP07的CR觉得效果不是很好,思路不清楚,隔几天再看,觉得没有那么混乱了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-5 16:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部