最后一次机会，30天计划，背水一战！冲！！！

泾渭不凡

      Woodrow Wilson was referring to the liberal idea of the economic market when he said that the free enterprise system is the most efficient economic system. Maximum freedom means maximum productiveness; our “openness” is to be the measure of our stability. Fascination with this ideal has made Americans defy the “Old World” categories of settled possessiveness versus unsettling deprivation, the cupidity of retention versus the cupidity of seizure, a “status quo” defended or attacked. The United States, it was believed, had no status quo ante. Our only “station” was the turning of a stationary wheel, spinning faster and faster. We did not base our system on property but opportunity—which meant we based it not on stability but on mobility. The more things changed, that is, the more rapidly the wheel turned, the steadier we would be. The conventional picture of class politics is composed of the Haves, who want a stability to keep what they have, and the Have-Nots, who want a touch of (a touch of:
有一点) instability and change in which to scramble for (scramble for: v.争夺, 勉强拼凑) the things they have not. But Americans imagined a condition in which speculators, self-makers, runners are always using the new opportunities given by our land. These economic leaders (front-runners) would thus be mainly agents of change. The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic speculation; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily staggered “starting lines.”“Reform” in America has been sterile because it can imagine no change except through the extension of this metaphor of a race, wider inclusion of competitors, “
a piece of the action,” as it were, for the disenfranchised. There is no attempt to call off the race. Since our only stability is change, America seems not to honor the quiet work that achieves social interdependence and stability. There is, in our legends, no heroism of the office clerk (office clerk: n.职员), no stable industrial work force of the people who actually make the system work. There is no pride in being an employee (Wilson asked for a return to the time when everyone was an employer). There has been no boasting about our social workers—they are merely signs of the system’s failure, of opportunity denied or not taken, of things to be eliminated. We have no pride in our growing interdependence, in the fact that our system can serve others, that we are able to help those in need; empty boasts from the past make us ashamed of our present achievements, make us try to forget or deny them, move away from them. There is no honor but in the Wonderland (wonderland: n.仙境, 奇境)race we must all run, all trying to win, none winning in the end (for there is no end).

Suri在奋斗

      Woodrow Wilson was referring to the liberal idea of the economic market when he said that the free enterprise system is the most efficient economic system. Maximum freedom means maximum productiveness; our “openness” is to be the measure of our stability. Fascination with this ideal has made Americans defy the “Old World” categories of settled possessiveness versus unsettling deprivation, the cupidity of retention versus the cupidity of seizure, a “status quo” defended or attacked. The United States, it was believed, had no status quo ante. Our only “station” was the turning of a stationary wheel, spinning faster and faster. We did not base our system on property but opportunity—which meant we based it not on stability but on mobility. The more things changed, that is, the more rapidly the wheel turned, the steadier we would be. The conventional picture of class politics is composed of the Haves, who want a stability to keep what they have, and the Have-Nots, who want a touch of (a touch of:
有一点) instability and change in which to scramble for (scramble for: v.争夺, 勉强拼凑) the things they have not. But Americans imagined a condition in which speculators, self-makers, runners are always using the new opportunities given by our land. These economic leaders (front-runners) would thus be mainly agents of change. The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic speculation; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily staggered “starting lines.”“Reform” in America has been sterile because it can imagine no change except through the extension of this metaphor of a race, wider inclusion of competitors, “
a piece of the action,” as it were, for the disenfranchised. There is no attempt to call off the race. Since our only stability is change, America seems not to honor the quiet work that achieves social interdependence and stability. There is, in our legends, no heroism of the office clerk (office clerk: n.职员), no stable industrial work force of the people who actually make the system work. There is no pride in being an employee (Wilson asked for a return to the time when everyone was an employer). There has been no boasting about our social workers—they are merely signs of the system’s failure, of opportunity denied or not taken, of things to be eliminated. We have no pride in our growing interdependence, in the fact that our system can serve others, that we are able to help those in need; empty boasts from the past make us ashamed of our present achievements, make us try to forget or deny them, move away from them. There is no honor but in the Wonderland (wonderland: n.仙境, 奇境)race we must all run, all trying to win, none winning in the end (for there is no end).

-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/2/27 17:18:40)

饭饭，我昨天分别两次做的两道讲什么女权啊社科的文章也全错
淡定淡定~~你的og12分析的很好，坚持啊~~！！

泾渭不凡

to Suri~~~谢谢Suri亲~~╭(╯3╰)╮╭(╯3╰)╮╭(╯3╰)╮

phoebe0624

抱抱，饭饭，这类文章我也错的多！

babybearmm

抱抱饭饭小可爱啊~可以想象那种文章就是很bt~
我还没复习阅读og呢，到时候就去沿着你的足迹走哈，加油

泾渭不凡

抱抱，饭饭，这类文章我也错的多！-- by 会员 phoebe0624 (2012/2/28 8:29:36

~~~~~~~~饭饭这类文章....sigh~~~小安81明天走起~~~~phoebe姐姐加油~~~

泾渭不凡

抱抱饭饭小可爱啊~可以想象那种文章就是很bt~
我还没复习阅读og呢，到时候就去沿着你的足迹走哈，加油

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/2/28 9:44:36)

~~~~~~~~~~哦肉肉~~~不敢当哇~~~姐姐阅读超强滴说~~~~~那个baby姐姐越障简直震撼哇~~~~~~
baby姐姐~~~抱抱抱抱抱抱抱抱抱抱~~~~

h14zpsn

miss绿光

我在SURI帖子里写过的，搬过来：
美国历史。女权。黑人。都是挺难的文章，这种文章作者的逻辑意图往往很纠结，像However, in addition的词汇比科学类的少很多~科学类的反而比较清晰，如OG里前几篇有一个是说fragment的Reason的，都是用disregard, reject,等词表述了几个原因来表示反对，最后一个用pausible来表示作者同意的那个原因~但是社会类的就真心纠结啊~GWD的这类文章往往是逻辑体现在字里行间，逻辑词都很难把握~
----
SO, do not be frustrated!!My little princess!!!
大家都是这么过来的，慢慢领悟，慢慢突破~

linuszhong

2月最后一天，总结总结，重新开始。
release my power