GWD-6-20以前没人问过

blackhorse

Q20:

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.        Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

1. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
2. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
3. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
4. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
5. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

答案：D。有点不明白。感觉D是支持呀。为什么不选A？

mindfree

You need to know what the conclusion is and what the premise is.

The conclusion is that the account encourage saving. However, if D is true and the money in that account is just savings from other account, the special account did not have the expected result.

As to A, you need to ask yourself, if A is correct, does the conclusion hold, i.e. does the account encourage saving? I say yes because withdrawn and saving are different. The fact that there is withdraw is out of scope for the conclusion.  

blackhorse

谢谢总教头，我再好好领会一下。

blackhorse

做这道题目的时候感觉D就是一个典型的逻辑答案，但就是没有想明白为什么。原来我把结论想错了。

tai6996

總教頭果然就是總教頭....太厲害了...

yuliyang

佩服！！！

Dennies

看来大家对这道题的答案都很统一了,想说说我自己的一点想法,开始时我也选的A,根本就没有重视D,D说甚么都么看完.

我认为A有加强的作用,既然有相当的人撤回了存款,但仍然达到了Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts的效果,更说明了方案的有效性支持了结论.大家觉的呢?

crossrose

d is right. Gut

foucsfei

D 在吸引存款上是成功的。是支持了结论,而非削若。

但是原文是要求

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Please help

catcenter

这道题还表明像E这样的,诉诸于权威的选项都是干扰选项,可以不与考虑