[求助]几道og罗辑真题求教?og-175,og-176,og-177,og-178

mariewoo

176。C选项为什么不行呢？
but指出的内容不是可以削弱么？
请指教，谢谢！

mariewoo

up

mariewoo

ding……

誓不低头的重生

178中的These facts show that future access to new life-sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents on newly developed life-sustaining drugs were to be abolished everywhere.
如何翻译 ？

尤其if从句后面的 我的理解the practice 是主语 但是和后面的were 不是主谓不一致吗？

ana9

178.

    

*题型 & 方法: Weaken; 他因-其他可能

    

*解释:

    

方法-->目的，而方法是取消或禁止，则证明该方法是达到目的前提或基础假设，不可以没有;

abolish
patent to new drugs --> improve access to new drugs. Actually, no patent, no new drugs =
reduced access 事与愿违

            

    

KATIEUS

以下是引用mariewoo在2006-7-23 10:50:00的发言：
176。C选项为什么不行呢？
but指出的内容不是可以削弱么？
请指教，谢谢！

前半句是对该计划的 优势，后半句是无关， 因为所涉及的对象以不再是该计划，而是MECHANICS。

 

KATIEUS

再次请教178 的C选项？

困惑很久了？

 

KATIEUS

(C) In some countries specific processes for the manufacture of pharmaceutical drugs can be patented even in cases in which the drugs themselves cannot be patented.
        

Choice C is incorrect since the possibility of patenting manufacturing processes introduces some limitation to the benefits of abolishing patents on the drugs, but does not mean that there would be no benefits.

绿色为OG的解释

不大明白

 

KATIEUS

Choice C is incorrect since the possibility of patenting manufacturing processes introduces some limitation to the benefits of abolishing patents on the drugs, but does not mean that there would be no benefits.