ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5602|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]gwd-11-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-16 09:04:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]gwd-11-12

gwd 11-12

Q12:


Which of the following most logically completes the argument?







The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  roponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.






  1. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

  2. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

  3. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

  4. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
  5. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

i think E is correct.



C的最大问题是:however 前后没有构成转折关系,Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.可以转化成:because the irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking, some people proponents


however 后的内容应该是说因为什么什么原因,所以不应该支持irradiation, 这样才能构成however 前后的转折关系。C 中只是说这两种不同的方法有各自不同的目的而已,不能说明irradiation 不好,体现不出however 的意味。尽管C也算是一种misleading.


E指出了 irradiation and cooking 加在一起会使事情变得更糟,而不象暗含的假设的那样“因为两种方法都同样破坏,所以用irradiation 无所谓”


欢迎继续讨论


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-17 06:07:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2004-8-17 12:29:00 | 只看该作者

this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since


这道题前面有过精彩的讨论,这里后面since的内容无疑是只需要说明misleading,the fact( irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking)而C说不能拿这两者比较,也就是说出了比较这个fact是误导。E是无关选项。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-17 12:29:28编辑过]
地板
发表于 2004-8-17 20:15:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 12:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部