- UID
- 692707
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-11-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Manhattan手册上面说的,Manhattan的老师上课也这么讲,可我以前都没看cd这里说过,不知道是不是我没发现.... Source: http://www.manhattangmat.com/pdf/gmat-uncovered.pdf
The GMAT includes what are called experimental, or nonoperational, questions. These questions do not count at all towards your score; instead, the test-makers are testing these questions on you in order to determine the Item Characteristic Curves (among other things) so that these questions can be used on future tests. (See the discussion on algorithms, earlier in this document, for more on Item Characteristic Curves.) Up to ten of the questions in each multiple-choice section (Quantitative and Verbal) may be experimental. (That means up to 25% of the questions that you answer in each section do not count toward your score.)
There are two big drawbacks to this. First, you have no idea which questions are experimental. You have to assume that any question you see counts; even very experienced test-takers cannot tell which ones don’t count. Second, the experimental questions don’t have any assigned difficulty level, so the algorithm doesn’t know that it’s about to give a very high-level test-taker a 10th percentile question, or vice versa. If you’re suddenly given a question that seems much easier than the previous questions, that doesn’t mean you’ve bombed the test; the question may be experimental. By the same token, if you suddenly see an impossible question, don’t despair or celebrate; again, there is a good chance that the question is experimental. Try your best within the expected timeframe for a question of that type and then move on. |
|