GWD3-Q32: Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.    art of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population. C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime. 这道题我选的是A,答案是C,但又在beatgmat给的答案是A还有,现在c我好像能有点明白了,但是A还是不是很明白 -- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/7 22:26:43)
讲讲我的思路哈。 这题A我做的时候压根没读懂,速度pass了,看到C选项就绝对对就选了。 思路是:政府认为监狱的人过的太舒服了,导致没有什么威慑力,所以犯罪率上升。因此为了降低犯罪率,取消监狱的大学课程。 反对的argument是:因为接受监狱教育的人比没有接受的人出狱后犯罪少,所以取消课程会提高犯罪率。 反对的内在逻辑是教育使人变好(这个推理是关键),出狱后不会犯罪,所以有利于降低犯罪率(ultimate goal)。对C取非,就是接受教育的人本来就比不接受的人犯罪可能性小。直接破坏了内在的逻辑:教育并不能使人变好。 |