og12第49题五个选项如下 (A) well founded though incomplete (B) difficult to articulate (C) plausible but poorly substantiated (D) seriously flawed (E) contrary to recent research 这篇文章的特点是第一段解释一个理论 随后第二段用however说这个理论的破绽 我以为选d,但答案是a。关于各选项的重新理解如下 A,well founded 词组,有理由的 B,articulate 明确有力的表达 - 只要没模棱两可含混不清的说,就算articulate C,substantiated 证实的 - 在说明中有例子evidance,就算substantiated D,严重缺陷 - 和a的incomplete比较难区分,本文是作者说了useful以后说问题的,所以不算seriously flawed E,contrary,相反的 - 本文无当代对比 abcd的含义较难分清,需要记住 -- by 会员 maxiv (2012/1/12 19:56:58)
49题是结构题 17题也是,两者错的原因相同--选项看不懂
17. Which of the following best describes the relation of the first paragraph to the passage as a whole? a. It makes a general observation to be exemplified exemplify是"例证"B. It outlines a process to be analysed process的n格是"过程,步骤" C. It poses a question to be answered pose"提出,讨论" D. It advanced an argument to be disputed advance"提出" dispute"辩论,怀疑,阻止" E. It introduces conflicting arguments to be reconciled reconcile"和解,调停"
b和d各错选过一次 b错在提出的并不是process d错在dispute含义不懂,全文解释了第一段,而不是怀疑或反对 |