|
哀哀,现在做逻辑怎么也得2分钟一道题。做90个花了一晚上的时间,还没总结。发现自己的记性很好,做过的逻辑题总是知道答案。发现心态非常重要,如果心平气和的作题,效果会好得多。后20个没做过的题错了4个,可是速度太慢了,一道题得2分多。 下面总结一下。。 195. A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors. The argument above assumes which of the following? (A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have. (B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions. (C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes. (D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions. (E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income. 这道题我第一句话就没看懂,主要是 deductions from taxable income for donations 不明白,看了好几遍,还是不太明白,好像是捐钱的人,纳税的收入减少,现在要改变。其实这道题本身不难,主要还是阅读的问题,不过如果把有极端词only的选项排除,剩下二选一就可以省去大量时间。大家帮忙看看,是不是这样总结逻辑? |