- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
3. Toxicologist: A survey of oil-refinery workers who work with MBTE, an ingredient currently used in some smog-reducing gasolines, found an alarming incidence of complaints about headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath. Since gasoline containing MBTE will soon be widely used, we can expect an increased incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
The logic chain of the argument is that since oil-refinery workers who work with MBTE are suffered with headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath, if gasoline containing MBTE is widely used, the incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath will increase. In Strengthen X question, we need to find the right answer that weakens the argument or has no effect on it. Each of the following, if true, strengthens the toxicologist’s argument EXCEPT:
(A) Most oil-refinery workers who do not work with MBTE do not have serious health problems involving headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
This answer choice strengthens the argument by showing that when the cause is absent, the effect does not occur. (B) Headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath are among the symptoms of several medical conditions that are potentially serious threats to public health.
Even though this answer is related to the factors in the conclusion, it has no effect on the conclusion, which is irrelevant to the public health. BA (C) Since the time when gasoline containing MBTE was first introduced in a few metropolitan areas, those areas reported an increase in the number of complaints about headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
This answer strengthens the argument by showing that when the cause happens, the effect follows it. (D) Regions in which only gasoline containing MBTE is used have a much greater incidence of headaches, fatigue, and shortness of breath than do similar regions in which only MBTEfree
gasoline is used.
The answer choice strengthens the argument by showing that the data used to make the conclusion is valid, and by comparing that scenario to regions in which the cause is absent. (E) The oil-refinery workers surveyed were carefully selected to be representative of the broader population in their medical histories prior to exposure to MBTE, as well as in other relevant respects.
The answer choice strengthens the argument by demonstrating that the data used to make the conclusion is valid.
29. (30663-!-item-!-188;#058&005676) To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats.
The increase in the number of commercial fish is irrelevant, these fish do not include harbor porpoises; otherwise, it would weaken the argument. (B) When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.
In this case, it accurately points out a hole in the logic chain, thus making the argument much more valid. BA (C) Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population.
Environmentalists are irrelevant. (D) The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters.
Even though it is not the time that harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters, the alarms may still protect the harbor porpoises from killing. (E) The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises.
The comparison of the costs is outside the scope of the argument.
30. (31171-!-item-!-188;#058&006066) An advertising agency must leave its office building. To save overhead costs, it is considering setting up a "virtual office" instead of moving to an adjacent office building. Employees will do their work on computers, as they do now, but will do so at home, sharing their work with colleagues by communicating text and designs to colleagues' computers through telephone lines, receiving typed comments, and then revising the work until it is satisfactory. Which of the following, if true, indicates a disadvantage of the virtual office plan?
(A) The agency can move its computers and associated equipment into employees' homes without purchasing any new equipment or requiring employees to purchase such equipment.
This answer choice strengthens the argument by showing that the cost of the plan can be reduced. (B) To reach the current office building and return home, employees spend an average of one and a half hours per day commuting, usually in heavy traffic.
The answer strengthens the argument by showing that with this proposal, employees can save a lot of time. (C) The employees of the advertising agency are accustomed to autonomy in monitoring their own progress and productivity.
The answer choice strengthens the argument by showing the autonomy of the employees that they can monitor their own progress and productivity. (D) Employees would be able to adapt quickly to using computers in a virtual office setting, since employees' current use of computers to produce designs requires a high level of skill.
This strengthens the argument. (E) Expressions and gestures in face-to-face exchanges are an important aid to employees in gauging the viability of new ideas they have proposed.
In this case, it points out a disadvantage of the virtual office plan, thus weakening the argument. BA
31. (31265-!-item-!-188;#058&006121) The symptoms that United States President Zachary Taylor began showing five days before his death are consistent with arsenic poisoning. Recent examination of Taylor's bones, however, revealed levels of arsenic comparable to those found in the bones of Taylor's contemporaries. These levels are much lower than the levels of arsenic that remain in the bones of arsenic poisoning victims who live for more than a day after ingesting a lethal dose of the poison. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the statements given?
(A) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death are consistent with poisoning other than arsenic poisoning.
Actually, this is opposite to the first sentence in the argument. (B) Taylor's death was not the result of any kind of poisoning.
We cannot rule out the probability that other kinds of poisoning may cause Taylor’s death. (C) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death were not caused by a lethal dose of arsenic.
Yes, if one person who has a lethal dose of arsenic lives more than a day, the level of arsenic that remain in the bones will be much higher than that of Taylor. BA (D) The symptoms that Taylor began showing five days before his death grew more severe each day.
We do not know how the development of the symptoms was. (E) It is unusual for a person who has ingested a lethal dose of arsenic to survive for more than a day.
So it may lead us to answer C, which shows that the symptoms of Taylor five days before his death were not caused by a lethal dose of arsenic.
|
|