ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: babypace
打印 上一主题 下一主题

babypace暂别G

[精华] [复制链接]
711#
发表于 2005-9-3 04:12:00 | 只看该作者
每一件事情都是围城
712#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-4 03:59:00 | 只看该作者

Research data indicate that


there is a great deal of poverty in


the United States among single-


Line     parent families headed by women.


(5)        This problem could result from


the fact that women’s wages are


only 60 percent of men’s. Some


economists believe that rigorous


enforcement of existing equal pay


(10)      laws would substantially decrease


this wage inequity. But equal pay


laws are ineffectual when women


and men are concentrated in different


occupations because such laws


(15)      require only that women and men


doing the same jobs be paid the


same. Since gender concentration


exists (for example, 80 percent of


clerical workers are women), other


(20)      economists argue that a comparable


worth standard, which would


mandate that women and men in


any jobs that require comparable


training and responsibility be paid


(25)      the same, should be applied


instead. But some policy analysts


assert that, although comparable


worth would virtually equalize male


and female wages, many single-


(30)      parent families headed by women


would remain in poverty because


many men earn wages that are


below the poverty line. These


policy analysts believe that the


(35)      problem is not caused primarily by


wage inequity but rather by low


wages coupled with single parent


hood, regardless of sex. As a


solution, they challenge the govern-


(40)      ment’s assumption that a family’s


income should depend primarily on


wages and urge the government to


provide generous wage supplements


(child and housing allow-


(45)      ances) to single parents whose


wages are low.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-8-Q35 :


The passage suggests that the United States government’s policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is



  1. considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue


  2. based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income


  3. under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts


  4. capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men


  5. applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-8-Q36:


Which of the following is most clearly an example of the policy advocated by the policy analysts mentioned in line 26 ?



  1. A government provides training to women who wish to move out of occupations in which women are concentrated.


  2. A government supports research that analyzes the connection between wage inequality and poverty among single-parent families headed by women.


  3. A government surveys wages annually to make certain that women and men in the same jobs receive the same pay.


  4. A government analyzes jobs in terms of the education and responsibility they require and publishes a list of jobs that should be considered equivalent for wage purposes.


  5. A government provides large rent subsidies to single parents whose wages are less than half the average worker’s wage.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-8-Q37:


According to the passage, some economists believe that, in the United States, there would be smaller differences between the wages of women and men who do the same jobs if



  1. equal pay laws were enforced more fully


  2. more stringent equal pay laws were passed


  3. a more rigorous comparable worth standard were developed and applied


  4. more men entered the occupations in which women are concentrated


  5. women received the same kind and amount of job training that men receive

这篇答案到底是什么?

713#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-4 04:23:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-8-Q20:


Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.




  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also


  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also


  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also


  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also


  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

还有这题。D是不是定下了?我觉得这题我喜欢D,因为这个not only but also不符合句子的逻辑意思。所以,不需要讨论not only but also 平行的问题,因为那根本不该用在这里。所以,我觉得D更符合句子原来要表达的意思。



另外,上面的阅读3题我都没有明白,到底大家都选了什么?

714#
发表于 2005-9-4 06:12:00 | 只看该作者

这篇阅读我选了BCA.


20题好像确实是D更符合逻辑意思.

715#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-4 12:18:00 | 只看该作者

这篇太奇怪了。我一题没对。能说说是怎么理解的吗?特别37题。我选了C。


到今天反而这篇错很多,担心。。。

716#
发表于 2005-9-4 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
babypace,我做的晚,还没做到8,没法和你讨论了,进来看看,给baby加加油,嘻嘻
717#
发表于 2005-9-4 12:46:00 | 只看该作者
大家加油哦
718#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-4 13:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用AegeanSea2006在2005-9-4 12:45:00的发言:
babypace,我做的晚,还没做到8,没法和你讨论了,进来看看,给baby加加油,嘻嘻


谢谢来捧场。我最想突破的是阅读。因为我觉得,如果文章能看懂,题目做错是很可惜的。如果阅读能再提高一下,我觉得会对SC也有好处的。所以我最近时间都在阅读上。情况还是好好坏坏。


不过我还是很喜欢XY GWD,没有重复题很好。

719#
发表于 2005-9-4 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用babypace在2005-9-4 13:31:00的发言:



谢谢来捧场。我最想突破的是阅读。因为我觉得,如果文章能看懂,题目做错是很可惜的。如果阅读能再提高一下,我觉得会对SC也有好处的。所以我最近时间都在阅读上。情况还是好好坏坏。


不过我还是很喜欢XY GWD,没有重复题很好。



有道理,我的阅读最烂了,正确率一直在50-60%之间,倒是稳定,hoho


好好学习,吃点好吃的,长长精神



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-4 16:40:12编辑过]
720#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-4 23:25:00 | 只看该作者

Aegean,其实我们还是可以讨论的。我前面做了没有讨论过。沧海开始做了。他会把问题帖过来,所以我们可以一起讨论。:D


关于吃,昨天跑朋友家party了,她父母来了,给我们做了地道中国菜。我总算吃上人饭了。。大饱口福了一次。回来兴奋,一下子还做了点阅读。


如果什么情绪都能用复习的方法来发泄就好了。那学习进步得多块啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-14 21:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部