- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
2.
High school students who feel that they are not succeeding in high school often drop out before graduating and go to work. Last year, however, the city’s high school dropout rate was significantly lower than the previous year’s rate. This is encouraging evidence that the program instituted two years ago to improve the morale of high school students has begun to take effect to reduce dropouts.
The argument attributes the lower high school dropout to the program instituted two years ago to improve the morale of high school students. In order to weaken the reasoning, we need to find other evidence that contributed to the lower dropout. Which one of the following, if true about the last year, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) There was a recession that caused a high level of unemployment in the city.
Since the recession is the reasonable factor (alternative cause) that can contribute the lower dropout, the argument can be weakened. If the job market need not so many people, those students willing to go to work would have to stay in high school. BA (B) The morale of students who dropped out of high school had been low even before they reached high school.
It cannot weaken the argument, because when they enter high school, those students’ morale can still be improved by the program. (C) As in the preceding year, more high school students remained in school than dropped out.
It cannot weaken the argument. (D) High schools in the city established placement offices to assist their graduates in obtaining employment.
In this case, it actually strengthens the argument. Because even though it is easier for those students to go to work, the dropout rate still decreases.
Besides, this is a Shell Game answer. It aims at the high school graduate rate, rather than dropout rate. (E) The antidropout program was primarily aimed at improving students’ morale in those high school with the highest dropout rates.
It cannot weaken the argument.
49. An overly centralized economy, not the changes in the climate, is responsible for the poor agricultural production in Country X since its new government came to power. Neighboring Country Y has experienced the same climatic conditions, but while agricultural production has been falling in Country X, it has been rising in Country Y. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Industrial production also is declining in Country X.
It seems to strengthen the argument, rather than weaken. (B) Whereas Country Y is landlocked, Country X has a major seaport.
It seems to be a contender, but the argument concerns the agricultural productions between X and Y, rather the locations between them. (C) Both Country X and Country Y have been experiencing drought conditions.
The same to A. (D) The crops that have always been grown in Country X are different from those that have always been grown in Country Y.
Yes! If the crops grown between the two countries are different, even though the climates in these two countries are same, the agricultural productions between them may still be different, thus having no relationship with the overly centralized economy. BA (E) Country X's new government instituted a centralized economy with the intention of ensuring an equitable distribution of goods.
It is outside the scope of the argument.
50. Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that
A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
Shell Game: the argument concerns about generally scientists, rather than serious scientific research. (B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
The argument has no relationship the ‘scientists whose renown are envied’. (C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
No evidence is provided by the argument about this. (D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
The gap of the argument is why renowned scientists are not deemed to be the true colleagues by most other scientists. Amazingly, the answer choice points out the gap and makes the logic perfect, because it reasons that those famous scientists may not do important new research referred in the first sentence of the argument. BA (E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
Those who are not scientists are out of the scope of the argument.
51. A company's two divisions performed with remarkable consistency over the past three years: in each of those years, the pharmaceuticals division has accounted for roughly 20 percent of dollar sales and 40 percent of profits, and the chemicals division for the balance. Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past three years from the statement above?
(A) Total dollar sales for each of the company's divisions have remained roughly constant.
Actually, we know nothing about total dollar sales for each of the divisions. (B) The pharmaceuticals division has faced stiffer competition in its markets than has the chemicals division.
It is the opposite answer. (C) The chemicals division has realized lower profits per dollar of sales than has the pharmaceuticals division.
Yes, we can see that profits per dollar of sales are higher in the pharmaceuticals than in the chemicals division. BA (D) The product mix offered by each of the company's divisions has remained unchanged.
Actually, we do not know the product mix of each of the company’s divisions. (E) Highly profitable products accounted for a higher percentage of the chemicals division's sales than of those of the pharmaceuticals division.
In fact, we know nothing about the sales construction between these two divisions.
52. The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races. Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
The market for cheap, traditional bicycles is outside the scope of the argument. (B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
The comparison between small workshops and major manufacturing concerns is irrelevant. (C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
The gap of the argument is the relationship between bicycle racers and what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races. Amazingly, this answer choice finds out the gap and makes the logic reasonable. BA (D) The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
The reason of the technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is irrelevant. (E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
Actually, it weakens the argument in some degree.
|
|