ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: jefferyli
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG246

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-8-26 17:04:00 | 只看该作者

I still have a question:


If "its" refers to "reputation",then the sentence can be rewritten like this: Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, but whose reputation declines after death and the reputation never regains its former status


这样就成了reputation regains status,个人认为应该是composer regains status ,另外,想问


c为什么不是: but whose reputation declines after death and who never regains its former status .   who为什么可以省略呢?

12#
发表于 2005-8-26 20:18:00 | 只看该作者
13#
发表于 2005-8-26 23:13:00 | 只看该作者
up!
14#
发表于 2005-8-29 16:33:00 | 只看该作者

up


15#
发表于 2005-9-8 14:37:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-5-6 5:32:00的发言:
composer是人, 即使用代词也不是its, 所以这里不存在指代不清.

那紫草MM的意思就是说 its指代的是 reputation ?


如果这样的话:


以下是引用carmenleaf在2005-8-26 17:04:00的发言:



I still have a question:


If "its" refers to "reputation",then the sentence can be rewritten like this: Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, but whose reputation declines after death and the reputation never regains its former status


这样就成了reputation regains status,个人认为应该是composer regains status .

16#
发表于 2005-9-19 18:00:00 | 只看该作者
it 是优先指 定语从句“whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status”中的主语reputation ,再其次指主句中的 the kind of composer
17#
发表于 2005-10-18 02:46:00 | 只看该作者
Choice A may also be faulted for the redundancy of never regains... again.可是这一用法在C里边也由阿,如何解释呢?
18#
发表于 2005-11-10 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fuyun在2005-10-18 2:46:00的发言:
Choice A may also be faulted for the redundancy of never regains... again.可是这一用法在C里边也由阿,如何解释呢?

選項(c) 沒有 again。

(c) but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status

19#
发表于 2006-3-11 17:02:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jefferyli在2004-7-28 21:18:00的发言:

246. Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again.
(A) often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and never regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and who never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death and never regained popularity


Key: C, agree. The question here is the highlighted after death, gramatically it should refer to reputation in first priority, rather than to composer, therefore causing confusing, am I right?


我覺得after death是指composer的death~沒有不嚴謹! 因為reputation的前面接的是whose呀! 表示是composer's reputation! 所以用death也該是composer's death~~ 這樣也很平行! 根據句意death怎麼可能是reputation的~ reputation只能上勝或下降! 怎麼能死?!  所以沒有confusing! (個人覺得sc還是以句意優先)

20#
发表于 2006-4-3 18:48:00 | 只看该作者

its指代的是 reputation .


(How can the composer regain his status after his death?  Dead person can no longer do anything, neither decline nor regain.)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 09:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部