ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1902|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充 16,2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-27 15:11:00 | 只看该作者

补充 16,2

2. The reason much refrigerated food spoils is that it


   ends up out of sight at the back of the shelf. So why


   not have round shelves that rotate? Because such


   rotating shelves would have just the same sort of


   drawback, since things would fall off the shelves’


   edges into the rear corners.



   Which of the following is presupposed in the


   argument against introducing rotating shelves?


   (A) Refrigerators would not be made so that their     


       interior space is cylindrical.


   (B) Refrigerators would not be made to have a


       window in front for easy viewing of their


       contents without opening the door.


   (C) The problem of spoilage of refrigerated food is


       not amenable to any solution based on design


       changes.


   (D) Refrigerators are so well designed that there are


       bound to be drawbacks to any design change.


   (E) Rotating shelves would be designed to rotate


       only while the refrigerator door was open.



选a , 证明方法不可行。


我有个疑惑。 就是e , 若desinged to rotate 只有在冰箱门开的情况下才行的话, refrigerated food spoils  就更不能避免了。 所以我选 e 了



可以给我讲讲为什么e错了么?

沙发
发表于 2004-7-28 00:23:00 | 只看该作者

It is an assumption type of question. E is not a required condition for the argument.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-28 10:20:00 | 只看该作者

看到了!~ 

谢谢mindfree~~。 

地板
发表于 2004-7-28 10:38:00 | 只看该作者
前提是冰箱内部空间不能被做成圆柱体,那题目中round shelves that rotate是做在方的冰箱中的圆型可以转动的架子咯?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-20 08:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部