ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products those industries were starting to make. As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of those industries to compete effectively in their export markets.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage about the products whose importation was banned?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2692|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-95

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-27 11:39:00 | 只看该作者

OG-95

To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned imports of the types of products those industries were starting to make. As a direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of those industries to compete effectively in their export markets.










94.


Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage about the products whose importation was banned?



(A) Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to make within country Z’s fledgling industries.



(B) Those products were ones that country Z was hoping to export in its turn, once the fledgling industries matured.



(C) Those products used to be imported from just those countries to which country Z’s exports went.



(D) Those products had become more and more expensive to import, which resulted in a foreign trade deficit just before the ban.



(E) Those products used to be imported in very small quantities, but they were essential to country Z’s economy.




A is the best answer.


B\C\D\E这四个选项我明白为什么错了,但我不明白为什么A对?


In Z, when the government banned imports of certain products the cost of those products rose, so the products must have been cheaper to import than they were to make in Z.


我觉得banned importsàcertain products 数量减少à此产品cost上升??



请指教!!送


沙发
发表于 2004-7-28 00:52:00 | 只看该作者
You are assuming a few things. The argument is quite straightforward: the domestic production was more expensive than import. When import is banned, the cost to buyers went up. This is what we can get directly from the argument without inserting any additional information we assume. Furthermore, where in the argument warrants your assumption that the domestic production could not meet the demand in quantity?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-28 08:10:00 | 只看该作者

偶今天吃完晚饭,就看到mindfree大牛牛的回帖,

where in the argument warrants your assumption that the domestic production could not meet the demand in quantity?

此句问得好,我,无话可说。真是一针见血!谢谢mindfree

地板
发表于 2005-7-27 23:26:00 | 只看该作者

能解释一下95吗?不太懂.我选的是E

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-25 06:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部