ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1632|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

各位大牛谁能帮我解答一下这道题?感激不尽!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-23 21:22:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.
19. Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.
正确选项C
20. The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.
(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.
正确选项:A 我选的是D
这道题,我第一问做对了,第二问没看明白什么意思,更没看懂正确选项和原文有什么关系,怎么就是weaken原文的证据了?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-11-23 21:54:15 | 只看该作者
削弱题。
我的理解是要求对其证据进行,证据表明中层的有城市毁灭后才出现的3号陶瓷器皿碎片。A选项从来源进行削弱,意思是当地存在一种掘地性的动物,有可能物品是由其挖掘的洞掉进中层的。
D选项是说中下层都有大量被火焚烧的废墟,无关项。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-23 22:35:47 | 只看该作者
能不能再说仔细点,还是有点不太明白,你的意思是削弱“因为第3类瓷器是在毁灭后才出现,因此中层底部以上就不会是毁灭以前的情况”这个证据吗?
我觉得如果是这样的话,逻辑跨度是不是太大了?还希望朋友能够详细的讲解一下!谢谢!!!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-23 22:38:10 | 只看该作者
削弱题。
我的理解是要求对其证据进行,证据表明中层的有城市毁灭后才出现的3号陶瓷器皿碎片。A选项从来源进行削弱,意思是当地存在一种掘地性的动物,有可能物品是由其挖掘的洞掉进中层的。
D选项是说中下层都有大量被火焚烧的废墟,无关项。
-- by 会员 粢米饭 (2011/11/23 21:54:15)



能不能再说仔细点,还是有点不太明白,你的意思是削弱“因为第3类瓷器是在毁灭后才出现,因此中层底部以上就不会是毁灭以前的情况”这个证据吗?
我觉得如果是这样的话,逻辑跨度是不是太大了?还希望朋友能够详细的讲解一下!谢谢!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 19:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部