ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1502|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教费费逻辑第38题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-26 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

请教费费逻辑第38题

38. Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.


Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:


(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.


(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.


(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.


(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.


(E) Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.


为什么d 不能选呢?a 确实不能有strengthen 的作用,但我认为d 也不能增强,说amphibians 的栖息地在上个世纪没有变小,(哦,我明白了,这相当于是一个假设,正因为它的 栖息地 没有变小,才可以看出是因为ozone 减少导致amphibians 的减少,对吗?)

沙发
发表于 2004-7-27 12:22:00 | 只看该作者

A:很好的起到了strengthen作用(请看清题目):排除他因

B:直接用事实支持

C:事实支持

D:无关选项,栖息地的减少和数量的减少没有必然的关系,而且也没有把该动物的数量变化和ozone的影响联系起来

E:事实支持

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-29 22:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部