一道逻辑 不明白

kakaxihx

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or, another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.





答案选C?
塑料的可以在更多condition下 使用 怎么就weaken 它引起的事故少了呢？

sunny1204

同求解

xyh

好像问题问的是：以下事情发生，最严重的消弱了所引证据的是。
文中内容：塑料和木质的sleds ，有证据表明塑料的导致发生更多的伤害，与去年相比。
A:只是习惯
B:无关
C:普遍意义。没提到 children injured
D: children injured 发生与材质无关
E:同B

xyh

新手，还不会做逻辑题。遇到逻辑题无从下手的感觉。不知逻辑题分出很多类型的目的是什么。是否是为了说明逻辑题的出题陷阱在那里，训练逻辑做题的思路？

kakaxihx

ding