lsat-16-2-23, thanks

jacy

23. Asbestos, an almost indestructible mineral once installed as building insulation, poses no health risk unless the asbestos is disturbed and asbestos fibers are released into the environment. Since removing asbestos from buildings disturbs it, thereby releasing asbestos fibers, the government should not require removal of all asbestos insulation.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Asbestos poses far less risk to health than does smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, improper diet or lack of exercise.

(B) Asbestos can post a health threat to workers who remove it without wearing required protective gear.

(C) Some kinds of asbestos, when disturbed, pose greater health risks than do other kinds.

(D) Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition.

(E) Much of the time, removed asbestos is buried in landfills and forgotten with no guarantee that it will not be disturbed again.

我选d,key:e
我的理解, 因为removing-->disturb-->should not require removal
所以选c, strengthen就是加强了evidence,说明removing确实会disturb.这样就加强了结论.
我认为e选项是无关.因为与问中的逻辑推理无关呀.
请问, 这样理解对吗?
另外:
我对support题型,经常会出错,有时是分不清事实型加强与无关的区别,
请问各位nn有没有什么方法在作surport题时?

albert

我的理解：

原文：
1。 当 asbestos is disturbed and asbestos fibers are released into the environment，会危害健康。
2。而 removing asbestos from buildings 正符合了条件1，
结论：the government should not require removal of all asbestos insulation.

原文只是说不要 remove asbeston insulation...

而D： Asbestos is inevitably disturbed by building renovations or building demolition.
和结论的：remove asbeston insulation无关。。如果结论是：不要building renovations or building demolition,则D才是SUPPORT。

再看E： 提到了removed asbestos，说他还有更远久的危害。。所以支持了结论： 不要remove asbestos....

jacy

谢谢 albert, 我明白了.
你真是厉害,我想你一定能考750+
那个时候看来你要先做好失眠的准备了.呵呵