ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3752|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-6-35突然又绕不过来了!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-17 05:55:00 | 只看该作者

OG-6-35突然又绕不过来了!

In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over


ten percent to the Black population of the United States


left the South, where the preponderance of the Black


population had been located, and migrated to northern


(5) states, with the largest number moving, it is claimed,


between 1916 and 1918. It has been frequently assumed,


but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in


what has come to be called the Great Migration came


from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent


(10) factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following


the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and


increased demand in the North for labor following


the cessation of European immigration caused by the


outbreak of the First World War in 1914. This assump-


(15) tion has led to the conclusion that the migrants’ subse-


quent lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to


rural background, a background that implies unfamil-


iarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.


But the question of who actually left the South has


(20) never been rigorously investigated. Although numerous


investigations document an exodus from rural southern


areas to southern cities prior to the Great Migration.


no one has considered whether the same migrants then


moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000


(25) Black workers, or ten percent of the Black work force,


reported themselves to be engaged in “manufacturing


and mechanical pursuits,” the federal census category


roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector. The


Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely


(30) of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising


to argue that an employed population could be enticed


to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions


then prevalent in the South.


About thirty-five percent of the urban Black popu-


(35) lation in the South was engaged in skilled trades. Some


were from the old artisan class of slavery-blacksmiths.


masons, carpenters-which had had a monopoly of


certain trades, but they were gradually being pushed


out by competition, mechanization, and obsolescence,


(40) The remaining sixty-five percent, more recently urban-


ized, worked in newly developed industries---tobacco.


lumber, coal and iron manufacture, and railroads.


Wages in the South, however, were low, and Black


workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the


(45)Black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled


workers in the North than they could as artisans in the


South. After the boll weevil infestation, urban Black


workers faced competition from the continuing influx


of both Black and White rural workers, who were driven


(50) to undercut the wages formerly paid for industrial jobs.


Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous


to a group that was already urbanized and steadily


employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subse-


quent economic problems in the North to their rural


background comes into question.



35. It can be inferred from the passage that the “easy conclusion” mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?


(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.


(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.


(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.


(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.


(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.


这是第二遍看了,我知道答案是C,就是把前面的假设改写了。但是看到这儿忽然觉得哪儿好像没绕过来,文章开头说大多数认为“GREAT MIGRATION”都是RURAL, 因为他们后来的经济问题,但是作者说移民都是URBAN,然后论证了半天,最后说人家的结论:把后来的经济问题和农村背景联系起来”是有问题的。但是给我的感觉好像作者并没反对后来这些移民有经济问题,可根据作者的观点这些经济问题又不是由城市移民造成的。不行了绕不清了!NN快帮忙,多谢了!!!

沙发
发表于 2004-7-17 10:37:00 | 只看该作者

文章细节定位。

easy conclusion --- This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants’ subsequent lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

反过来想,如果rural background person are familiar with urban living and succeeded in cities, 那还能lack of economic mobility in the North 吗

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-20 07:02:00 | 只看该作者
right! 醋醋妹妹thank you!
地板
发表于 2005-7-10 21:41:00 | 只看该作者

所以说作者驳斥的是lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to rural background,而作者论证的是economic problem不是由于rural background引起的,是这个意思吗?


Arguement: rural background -> black migrant from South suffer from economic problem
Flaw: black migrant from South are urban background
所以weaken了Arguement,说明了economic problem不是rural background引起

5#
发表于 2005-7-12 16:49:00 | 只看该作者
顶。
6#
发表于 2005-7-14 12:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用enovy在2005-7-10 21:41:00的发言:

所以说作者驳斥的是lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to rural background,而作者论证的是economic problem不是由于rural background引起的,是这个意思吗?


Arguement: rural background -> black migrant from South suffer from economic problem
Flaw: black migrant from South are urban background
所以weaken了Arguement,说明了economic problem不是引起


我的理解是,由于rural background 不成立,所以migrant根本不lack the economic mobility。

但其实对做题没影响

7#
发表于 2005-10-4 08:18:00 | 只看该作者

又吸收了一題  實在感謝

8#
发表于 2005-10-5 13:38:00 | 只看该作者
This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants’subsequent lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background comes into question(产生质疑)

9#
发表于 2011-4-27 16:12:57 | 只看该作者
(OG12-138) It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the North for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the First World War in 1914.This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants’ subsequent lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.
此处的this assumption就是指的是“it is been frequently assumed ...",既然这样,为什么A,B等涉及到economic motives的选项不对呢?


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-2 15:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部