ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4331|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-Q36 求教啊~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-15 15:25:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
小女子的阅读一直很烂。。。求大神们指教!!拜托!
In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are directly related to end products. With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production, corporations often favor “supplier partnerships” (arrangements in which the purchaser forgoes the right to pursue alternative suppliers), which can inappropriately shelter suppliers from rigorous competitive scrutiny that might afford the purchaser economic leverage.There are two independent variables—availability of alternatives and ease of changing suppliers—that companies should use to evaluate the feasibility of subjecting suppliers of indirect purchases to competitive scrutiny. This can create four possible situations.

In Type 1 situations, there are many alternatives and change is relatively easy.Open pursuit of alternatives—by frequent competitive bidding, if possible—will likely yield the best results.In Type 2 situations, where there are many alternatives but change is difficult—as for providers of employee health-care benefits—it is important to continuously test the market and use the results to secure concessions from existing suppliers.Alternatives provide a credible threat to suppliers, even if the ability to switch is constrained. In Type 3 situations, there are few alternatives, but the ability to switch without difficulty creates a threat that companies can use to negotiate concessions from existing suppliers. In Type 4 situations, where there are few alternatives and change is difficult, partnerships may be unavoidable.
GWD1-Q36:

Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

A.They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.

B.They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

C.They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.

D.They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.

E.  They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

为什么是B啊?文中不是指提到了economic leverage么?就是只pay more吗?为什么不选D?谢谢~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-15 18:21:30 | 只看该作者
没人理么。。。。T T
板凳
发表于 2011-10-19 15:44:33 | 只看该作者
顶你,我这篇全错,太爽了
地板
发表于 2011-10-20 05:18:54 | 只看该作者
【原文】竞争性审查只限于直接相关货物,对于间接相关货物,公司喜欢和供货商达成伙伴关系。
【选项】D. 对于直接相关货物,供货伙伴关系不可行。
●从原文不能推出选项D
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-23 08:49:45 | 只看该作者
就是说D太绝对咯?恩恩~懂了。。。但是为什么B是对的呢?谢谢~~~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-23 08:51:06 | 只看该作者
我也差不多,错了2/3 ,做GWD就是找打击啊,鼓励自己好好复习。。。 T T
7#
发表于 2011-12-4 17:19:21 | 只看该作者
有合作伙伴的关系后就不能去挑选供应商,所以可能付出的更多,因为供应商木有竞争了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-5 22:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部