- UID
- 653013
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
板凳

楼主 |
发表于 2011-10-12 16:21:08
|
只看该作者
Verbal部分,楼主就真的是乐极生悲了。。。 先说语法,比机经上说的要难不少。。。楼主前面做得很小心,应该是没怎么错,后来心态不好,看时间紧了,就静不下心来来,慢慢对比,感觉做的不好。。。not only did sb do sth, but sb also did sth 考到了 aime at/for 瞄准,对准 与 aim to do 致力于,打算 的区别也考了 然后就没了,全是至少画一行的到全部的句子。。。要耐心看、对比,应该还是不算太难,所以Gmat对心理素质要求还是很高的,楼主连模考都没做过(拍自己一砖头!),直接上考场就是一个悲剧!!! 逻辑的机经我是看的最认真,全看完、做完了,结果只碰到3个吧,还都是在我遇到高分题以及之前。。。然后你们懂得。。。RP不够啊。。。 1、去年种corn的农民都regret了,因为去年demand大升,price大升,今年也是harvest,demand不减,农民还是准备早卖掉,问explanation sol:E.农民的仓库不够大,存不下。 2、Professor: 这世上很多人从事的职业最后都能被成为profession,比如律师还是啥的。但是很奇怪地,management这个行当的人就不能归到这类里面去,为嘛啊?私以为啊,manager中难出profession人才。因为manager都先考虑自身利益,这和公众对profession判断的标准不符。 答案就是选和公众对profession判断的标准不符。 3、讲某地一年大半时间在下雨,孩子们都躲在家里。然后潮湿的空气会让孩子得某种疾病。当地孩子得这种病几率高。结论是室内空气更容易让孩子得这种病。问evaluation A.室内空气是否含有别的细菌或元素之类的会诱发这种病 B.那些呆在室外的孩子是否也容易得这种病 (我选的这个) C.是否有治疗这种病的方法。 这一题就是我碰到的高分区标志----评价题。。。然后很开心,想进入高分区了,嘿嘿,然后就高兴过头,乐极生悲了!!!之后看题目就感觉飘飘然,做得迷迷糊糊的。。。 评价题是在做到大概2/3时候碰到,之前一直做的很顺,感觉很好,遇到机经,就比较轻松,没碰到,也能慢慢看着排除法勾出答案。。。评价题之后,我就灵魂出窍了,看什么题目都没耐心,碰到机经还好一点,没碰机经就没耐心看题。。。悲剧就是这么产生的。。。 阅读有4篇有3篇基金,第一篇比较简单,就1面那种,不太记得了,貌似机经上没有,但还是做得很顺利。 第二篇是market rebel,这个机经很详细,做得也还行。 1. 在Market Rebel中,Activist 对 Business innovation的推动作用 2. 举例电脑出现和被接受;Gasoline汽车(environmental movement帮它Pave了道路) 3. 举例:1900s初期的汽车。 题目: 1. 第一段的作用 2. Environmental Movement高亮,问作用 3. 类比题:哪种情况符合market rebel的条件 4. Activist是什么样的人 5. 考了expect哪些不是这些club做的(选让xx降价)(这个我没考到) 6. 1970s的电脑和1900s初的汽车的共同点 Normally when we construct an account of any industry, technology, or market, we rely on the great-man theory. So Bill Gates matters. Henry Ford, Sam Walton, Philip Knight matter. These founders of great companies are important, but we don't understand what made their accomplishments possible. That's where collective action plays a big role. A rebel, by definition, is one who defies authority. For me, a market rebel is one who bucks conventional wisdom, who challenges existing norms, who's so committed to a cause that he or she doesn't mind incurring the costs of organizing collective action. In fact, the cost of not acting is what impels many of them. They construct a hot cause, which taps deep-seated emotions of anger or pride, but they also get people to engage in new behaviors through unconventional or cool techniques of mobilization. Take, for example, the automobile industry in America. Most books give pride of place to Henry Ford, who introduced mass production. But why did he believe there was a mass market when early reactions to the automobile were that it was a devilish contraption—evil, strange, unreliable, and of poor quality? Farmers said it would cause havoc to farmland. Anti-speeding activists said it was a threat to pedestrians. Yet it came to be accepted, and the unsung heroes were automobile enthusiasts, many of them physicians, who formed automobile clubs. They realized they needed state speed limits, not a maze of regulations. They also lobbied for licensing of drivers and the registration of automobiles, which then became a source of tax revenue. They also asked, "How do you show other people that a car is viable?" You don't give 15 speeches. You have 10 cars climb Pike's Peak, 15 cars go on an endurance run, or 20 cars seek to shatter a speed record. These organized events made audiences realize the car could do a bunch of things. When that happened, Henry Ford, who had observed assembly-line techniques in butcher shops, realized he could sell a bunch of cars. So I argue, without the automobile enthusiasts between 1895 and 1912, you wouldn't have had mass production. Similar arguments could be made about the personal computer industry. There was a priestly class entrusted with the responsibility of managing the computer, and activists said, "Wait a minute. Why do we need that priestly class in between us and the computer?" They came together in hobby clubs. Out of these meetings of tinkerers, we have early products that paved the way for the personal computing industry. Nike is an iconic American company, and if you asked Philip Knight [MBA '62], I imagine he would acknowledge that the running movement, where running wasn't something five university athletes did but something everybody did, made Nike possible. These are examples of how social movements and market rebels make new industries, new niches, and new markets possible. 第三篇是政府节能,这个也简单。 第一段,提出现象:reduction of carbon已经成为当今的issue. 但研究发现许多公司仍然使用不那么环保的一些方式,如仍然在使用”…light”(某一种灯) 而不用”….”(某种节能灯吧) 第二段,解释现象:为什么公司不改换那种节能灯呢?因为公司管理者没有计算…成本。实际上,换了节能灯save large amount of money and the effect is maximized. 第三段,提出solution:tax on the carbon emission 并不能让公司改装节能灯。反而,Government-regulated standard is a possible way to solve the problem. 尽管economist 认为市场应由companies 本身来决定,government 不应干涉。(我当时读的貌似跟机经这个有出入,我的理解是第三段说作者说非常有趣的是在这件事上无论是私人主体(企业没换节能灯)还是政府干预(税收无效),以及市场都失灵了。) 问题: 1. 第三段Both Public and private good. Public good指什么 (减少引起全球变暖的排碳量) 2. 第三段的function 3. 政府的政策干预为什么不好 然后在评价题之后碰到了第四篇阅读,寂静上有,但有跟没有几乎没有区别!!!楼主的实力不够,RP更不够啊!!! 就是这篇:火山喷发 [版本1] by raphael0827 阅读有一个说的是lava,先说lava流的慢,会吸收一种矿物,释放另一种矿物,后来举个反例,提出两个假设,第一个是错的,第二个合理。 [版本2] by leeern 750, Q 51, V 40 火山喷发第一段主要说一个实验, 第二段说海底发现的lava, 生词较多, 建议大家时间充裕的话可以看几集Discovery讲火山的补补背景知识. [版本3] by laixiangeffort 火山爆发的 一共2段 就是那个lava jj上讲的很不全 但是他说这是高分库里面的 所以我郁闷了 因为我也遇到了 但是楼主表示前30道题正确率应该挺高 后来是被时间影响了应该。这是出现在前30到中的火山爆发 balabala 讲到了一个试验(有题目)题目:问什么melten的什么是哪个揭示的就在第一段 所以楼主选了这个试验讲到了melten lava在流动时候与周围exchange 一个含氧的什么物质 第二段 因为到距离地面多少km以后却发现不再交换了 所以提出了2个假设 第一个假设根本没看懂说什么 好像是什么因为到地面了以后流速很快之类的 但是作者是否定这个的第二个假设 也没看懂 反正题目好像不要求你看懂 题目2:问文章主旨是什么 忘了选项
这篇阅读再次做的极差,几乎彻底把我从高分区踢了出来!!! 后面就更别提了,全是新题。。。然后就是妥妥的悲剧啊!!! |
|