A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker's Beach, the world's sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker's Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. Clearly, environmentalists' prediction that the world's Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of the environmentalists' prediction?
A major chemical spilloccurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggslaid that year from hatching. Yet thenumber of adult female Merricks returning tolay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since fiveyears ago. Clearly, environmentalists’prediction that the world’s Merrick populationwould decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.Which of the following,if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of theenvironmentalists’ prediction?
A. The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time whenthere were neither Merrick sea turtles nor Merricksea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach. B. Female Merrick sea turtlesbegin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are ten years old. C. Under normal conditions, only a small proportion ofhatchling female Merrick sea turtles survivein the ocean until adulthood and return to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach. D. Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spillhave caused a significant decline in the population of one of the severalspecies of sea birds that prey on Merrick seaturtle eggs. E. After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected aproposal to increase the Merrick sea turtlepopulation by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to nearby beaches that hadnot been affected by the spill.