ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2355|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道东方的题,弄不懂答案,大家帮忙看看。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-6-8 11:32:00 | 只看该作者

一道东方的题,弄不懂答案,大家帮忙看看。

20. For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
答案就是A,大家帮我分析分析。谢谢。
沙发
发表于 2003-6-8 23:34:00 | 只看该作者
大前提:牛牛想不通的答案,就是答案错。
结论:答案错。
板凳
发表于 2003-6-8 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
肯定答案是A吗? 也许列出其他答案用排除法来做更容易些。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-6-9 11:23:00 | 只看该作者
这是不是那条原则呢?看不懂的,找不到答案就选A
5#
发表于 2003-6-9 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
Mike,你可能看错了。这题我见过,答案是C。
Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only avialable means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-26 00:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部