ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: shrryxie
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[罗技] 玖尔斯逻辑汇总 (共136只,截止10/15 15:10)

[精华] [复制链接]
81#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:32:56 | 只看该作者
Q37. (by zhangtao1125)土地开发保护:BF题,这个好像以前看过,期待考古!说什么环保支持者为了保护土地要购买下来,这个作者说肯定不行,因为什么开发了农民能得到更多的钱,所以如果你要买,农民肯定把土地都develop了。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
这道题我也好像在哪儿见过,但我之前没看过机经,只看过OG、Verbal和PREP08,刚才粗粗的查了一下,没找到,期待神奇的XYXB
82#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:34:53 | 只看该作者
LZ, 38题是不是和30题是一个?
-------------------------------------------------------
Q38. (by ayy90 (M51,V37)) 调查幸福感:说那些物质上不富裕的人调查显示,比那些物质上富裕的更幸福。削弱,我选的那些物质不富裕的故意说很幸福。
-------------------------------------------------------
Q30.
V1.(by 清明00)还有一个关于收入和幸福的,就是调查发现收入高的幸福多,所以断言金钱还是可以多少左右幸福的,问削弱。
我选择穷的人得到的是真心实意的幸福。。
83#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:38:54 | 只看该作者
LZ,41题和26题是不是也是同款?
-------------------------------------------------------
Q41. (by白小白白)1.柴油车和汽油车换电动车,柴油比汽油环保,但是柴油认为电动车也很污染,电力都是靠其他方式来的,更污染环境。但是有个人还是认为汽油车要换电动车。支持他的观点。我貌似选了发电的话是在偏远的地方。而柴油烧的话还是在城里。。。。。
-------------------------------------------------------
Q26. (by 金融小三 (M51V29 680))在美国,有三种车,一种是电动的,一种是烧汽油的,还有一种是烧清洁燃料的,现在告诉大家烧清洁燃料的会比电动车更加省钱更加环保,但是在未来电动车取代汽油车的可能性将比清洁燃料车取代汽油车的可能性要大,问为什么?
答案有 在城市车辆密集的地方有很多供电站,这是电动车共容易取代汽油车。 我选的这个
84#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:46:13 | 只看该作者
37 我也覺得有見過
不過印象不是BF題

不確定...
85#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:49:54 | 只看该作者
Q49. (by lynn2011 )灌溉需要水,而河边肿了STRIP OF TREE也要水,但是某某却说如果把树移除,灌溉的水会更少。问SUPPORT
。狗主选的是树木可以减少水分蒸发。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
这个我确定绝对见过!而且狗主选对了
我明天起来去找找
86#
发表于 2011-9-29 23:50:15 | 只看该作者
LZ, 38题是不是和30题是一个?
-------------------------------------------------------
Q38. (by ayy90 (M51,V37)) 调查幸福感:说那些物质上不富裕的人调查显示,比那些物质上富裕的更幸福。削弱,我选的那些物质不富裕的故意说很幸福。
-------------------------------------------------------
Q30.
V1.(by 清明00)还有一个关于收入和幸福的,就是调查发现收入高的幸福多,所以断言金钱还是可以多少左右幸福的,问削弱。
我选择穷的人得到的是真心实意的幸福。。
-- by 会员 rubyrain0607 (2011/9/29 23:34:53)



LZ,41题和26题是不是也是同款?
-------------------------------------------------------
Q41. (by白小白白)1.柴油车和汽油车换电动车,柴油比汽油环保,但是柴油认为电动车也很污染,电力都是靠其他方式来的,更污染环境。但是有个人还是认为汽油车要换电动车。支持他的观点。我貌似选了发电的话是在偏远的地方。而柴油烧的话还是在城里。。。。。
-------------------------------------------------------
Q26. (by 金融小三 (M51V29 680))在美国,有三种车,一种是电动的,一种是烧汽油的,还有一种是烧清洁燃料的,现在告诉大家烧清洁燃料的会比电动车更加省钱更加环保,但是在未来电动车取代汽油车的可能性将比清洁燃料车取代汽油车的可能性要大,问为什么?
答案有 在城市车辆密集的地方有很多供电站,这是电动车共容易取代汽油车。 我选的这个
-- by 会员 rubyrain0607 (2011/9/29 23:38:54)




的确有相似处,但还是存在不同,不排除回忆本身存在偏差,保险起见先分开编号,日后若有更多的同学确认版本了再将其合并吧。

昨日更新的题目我还没来得及看,今晚有点忙,刚处理完,等我洗个澡回来再帮大家考古吧,可能会比较晚,备考的同学先休息吧,明天再来追考古内容吧。
87#
发表于 2011-9-30 00:30:05 | 只看该作者
Q37. (by zhangtao1125)土地开发保护:BF题,这个好像以前看过,期待考古!说什么环保支持者为了保护土地要购买下来,这个作者说肯定不行,因为什么开发了农民能得到更多的钱,所以如果你要买,农民肯定把土地都develop了。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
这道题我也好像在哪儿见过,但我之前没看过机经,只看过OG、Verbal和PREP08,刚才粗粗的查了一下,没找到,期待神奇的XYXB
-- by 会员 rubyrain0607 (2011/9/29 23:32:56)



28.GWD-18-Q20
Environmentalorganizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn WildernessArea from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who ownit.  That plan is ill-conceived:  if the farmers did sell their land, theywould sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any otherbidders.  On the other hand, thesefarmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming itremains viable.  But farming will notremain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lackthe financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would beto assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintainviability.

Inthe argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of thefollowing roles?

A.   The first presents a goal that the argumentrejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as groundsfor that rejection.
B.   The first presents a goal that the argumentconcludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of thatconclusion.
C.   The first presents a goal that the argumentconcludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D.   The first presents a goal, strategies forachieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgmentproviding a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E.    The first presents a goal that the argumentendorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must bechanged if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
88#
发表于 2011-9-30 00:37:27 | 只看该作者
Dear,在做更新日志的时候,前面的题目如果有新版本更新、添加也请一并标注出来,不仅仅标注新增的题目。辛苦了
89#
发表于 2011-9-30 02:44:31 | 只看该作者
37题考古
GWD-18-Q20
Environmentalorganizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn WildernessArea from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who ownit.  That plan is ill-conceived:  if the farmers did sell their land, theywould sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any otherbidders.  On the other hand, thesefarmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming itremains viable.  But farming will notremain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lackthe financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would beto assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintainviability.

Inthe argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of thefollowing roles?

A.   The first presents a goal that the argumentrejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as groundsfor that rejection.

B.   The first presents a goal that the argumentconcludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of thatconclusion.

C.   The first presents a goal that the argumentconcludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.

D.   The first presents a goal,strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the secondis a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particularstrategy.

E.      The firstpresents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situationthat the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in theforeseeable future.


40题考古
V1
还有一道航空公司造了新型超音速飞机,想面向世界最大的市场,面向那些不想挤经济舱的商务人士,飞机最大的优点是能够在超音速以下的一档速度巡航飞行。总裁相信这飞机能够成功。问以下哪个加强。(from   720

V2
说有个飞机制造公司要推销他们的一种超音速飞机以盈利,他们的超音速飞机主要推荐给那些需要乘坐businessjet以避免commercial–air hassel 而且以前乘坐businessjet又没有飞的那么快的客户。但是,这种飞机的最大的赢利点是在于相对于其他的超音速飞机,这种飞机也可以在非超音速的速度上飞的很好,飞机制造公司说这才是他们这种飞机的重要的赢利点,原因是:我选的是 由于在美国,世界上最大的businessjet 市场,超音速飞行是被禁止的。
V3
E, inthe United States, the largest business jet market…



44题考古
V1
玛雅文化,大概的意识是说发现了某种东西(陶器?),  然后说为什么说这种东西是从外地来的. 问原因. .650
V2
古玛雅文化中使用的陶器含有一中可以断定年代的物质,但是这种物质很容易随着时间的推移而消失.但是我们可以从现代的啕瓷器物中得到一样可以用来研究的物质.是为什么?



47题考古
V1(740)
一个教外语的学校说, 因为近来国际贸易有所增加, 这个趋势说明会需要越来越多的懂外语的人. 所以政府应该把它从外企那里多收的税拿来教育投资教授外语的学校. assumption.我选了政府可以从增加的国际贸易中获取更多的税收.
V2
说老师说政府应该资助外语教学,因为现在越来越多企业需要双语人才,然后政府可以通过这些拥有双语人才企业的缴税来得利,问的是评估,还是假设?==|||
V3
题干大意前面鸡精都说得很详细了,问假设。
我选的是,政府资助的增加会导致外语人才的增加。
V4
有个外国语大学建议政府给它补助(好像是)。因为随着企业越来越国际化,如果企业有许多外语方面的人才,那么就能赚更多钱,也就能纳更多税。问:以下哪一项是需要考虑的?我选的好像是政府的补助会不会提高外国语大学的教育水平。仅供参考哈!
V5
一位老师建议,政府投资培养说外国语言的学生 回报大于成本,因为学生毕业后去global公司工作,公司盈利更高会上缴更多tax 政府就其实是赚了。问evaluate 感觉是:可以保证某地区政府培养的学生毕业后会在该地区工作
V6
(变体)还有一道是JJ里的第20有个外国语大学建议政府给它补助(好像是)。因为随着企业越来越国际化,如果企业有许多外语方面的人才,那么就能赚更多钱,也就能纳更多税,我遇到的问题是assumption,我选的是企业需要的外语人才有部分是从学校来的。
V7
(760分版本)确认:我同样非常犹豫上述选项:
B. Long-term willbenefit the availability of 外语人才 inthis region
E. The corporations have people who can speak multiple language atleast have some this kind of people who acquired the skills from school classes
(选了B,因为题目中才说到,为了long-term什么什么的,觉得现在企业have不太相关)



49OG 10变体
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river’s watersupply is strictly controlled: farms along the river each have a limitedallocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation. But the trees that growin narrow strips along the river’s banks also use its water. Clearly,therefore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be availablefor crop irrigation.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens theargument?
(A) The trees along the river’s banks shelter it from the sun andwind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation.   answer
(B) Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake theexpense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greaterallocation of water in return.
(C) Many of the tree species currently found along the river’sbanks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remainconstantly wet.
(D) The strip of land where trees grow along the river’s bankswould not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.  
(E) The distribution of water allocations for irrigation isintended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farmsfarther downstream.



51题合并至第27



90#
发表于 2011-9-30 14:35:44 | 只看该作者
Q36. (by zhangtao1125) 好像是因为伐木,有人就说这威胁到了一种鸟,但是观察发现这种鸟却增加了,问解释
有个选项是因为伐木使书顶棚变少了,鸟更容易发现捕食者。还有一个是因为伐木,这种鸟能找到以前难以发现的食物。答案应该就在这两个里面。
考古:
还有一个解释题,就是人们一开始认为logging会减少某种鸟数量,可事实反而增加了。我纠结了一下,有两个选项觉得对,一个是A~logging让鸟儿的捕猎范围扩大了,就是吃的多了;还有一个是树冠没有这种鸟更容易发现敌人……我选了后者,不一定对啊!


这题大家觉得选什么呢 我觉得选 吃的多了吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-30 01:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部