逻辑一道 帮帮忙吧 各位大仙 急急急

guo573874201

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.


Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
   
2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
   
3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
   
4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
   
5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
   没有看懂提问的意思  帮忙解释一下吧
   

guo573874201

没人来吗 顶一下吧

Hotsausage

我覺得選C

題干問啥情況下the petition 會誤導 voters 去相信現有的禁菸 ordinance 會增強 its effect. 換句話說, 也就是說啥情況可以削弱 the effect of the pepition. C) 說 petition 帶來的 state law 會取代現有的ordinance, 可是現有的ordinance 還比新的 state law 來的強, 所以 state law 會削弱現有的 smoking ban.

ch20010444

ls +1
petition僅僅問目的 而不説明原因 所以選項應該從petition的原因下手