【每日逻辑链练习贴】【逻辑2-14】

daisyの小夢想

1. 44s
T: They are human footprints. Because they resemble human beings'.
G: They can't be human foootprints. Because if so, the hominids would have to walk in an awkward manner.
Weaken T: Other animals can walk like human beings.
B


2. 24s
Premise: The now energatic friendly small cars are more likely to have car accident than the old bigger cars.
Conclusion: The idea of energy saving should not be recommended.
Weaken: a. Other reason caused the low safety of small cars.
b. Small cars can be easily improved to have higher safety.
B

3. 45s
Those who lacks knowledge in one field shold not have authority and judgment in one field.
Only the expirienced political man can make judgement on policy.
Weakness: assumption: seasoned politician has a good knowledge of new policy.
D

4. 60s
The thing has been found in greatest density in geographically stable areas.
Conclusion: the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in those regions can explain this.
Assumption: cry. i don't know
D

daisyの小夢想

错了第二、第三题

daisyの小夢想

2. (B) Although fatalities in accidents involving small cars have increased since 1977, the number of accidents has decreased.(人家就是就fatalities而论!!!)
(C) New computerized fuel systems can enable large cars to meet fuel efficiency standards established by the recent guidelines.（Other reason caused the higher safety of large cars. 你就死想着会有其他理由导致small cars不安全，没有转一点弯弯）

3. (D) equates political know-how with understanding the social implications of political policies (看清楚这句话是什么意思，know-how是专门知识，技术，敲门的意思。social implications无关。)
(E) assumes that when inexperienced politicians set policy they are guided by the advice of more experienced politicians
( learned trough apprenticeship and experience.  晚来有个Jump!真鬼祟。)

daisyの小夢想

哎，今晚脑袋塞不下了0 0，纳丁，第一天。。噗，实在是太可爱了。。

第一步：审题  ==> 第一个人说，那个大脚掌是人留下的；第二个不同意，说如果是人留下的那它的走路的话是两条腿交叉着的。。

第二步：看选项B：它说“有一种熊，它的大拇指长在最外头，小指头长在最里头”

第三步：看下自己的脚==>你会惊奇的发现，你的脚大拇指是长在最里头的！！！！！

然后，它就证明了第二个人的说法，削弱了第一个人的..... Orz   Orz   Orz  ..............

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/9/10 21:52:59)

那个大小拇指位置不一样的，话，印子应该看的出来的啊。

那题D为什么不行呢？



还有第3题也不懂呢？？

-- by 会员 纳丁Cat (2011/9/11 8:39:21)

纳丁想太多了。 weaken和support的题都是只要有那么一点可能weaken到也算对的，不用想"如果怎么怎么样 它就无法weaken了"的情况。
D无影响。因为剩下的footprints只要是完整的 照样有代表性。而且讨论的不就是那些目前能看到的footprints嚤 注意讨论的范围~

纳丁Cat

哎，今晚脑袋塞不下了0 0，纳丁，第一天。。噗，实在是太可爱了。。

第一步：审题  ==> 第一个人说，那个大脚掌是人留下的；第二个不同意，说如果是人留下的那它的走路的话是两条腿交叉着的。。

第二步：看选项B：它说“有一种熊，它的大拇指长在最外头，小指头长在最里头”

第三步：看下自己的脚==>你会惊奇的发现，你的脚大拇指是长在最里头的！！！！！

然后，它就证明了第二个人的说法，削弱了第一个人的..... Orz   Orz   Orz  ..............

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/9/10 21:52:59)

那个大小拇指位置不一样的，话，印子应该看的出来的啊。

那题D为什么不行呢？



还有第3题也不懂呢？？

-- by 会员 纳丁Cat (2011/9/11 8:39:21)

纳丁想太多了。 weaken和support的题都是只要有那么一点可能weaken到也算对的，不用想"如果怎么怎么样 它就无法weaken了"的情况。
D无影响。因为剩下的footprints只要是完整的 照样有代表性。而且讨论的不就是那些目前能看到的footprints嚤 注意讨论的范围~

-- by 会员 daisyの小夢想 (2011/9/11 15:45:23)

第一题懂了，第3题还是不明白，我选的B

daisyの小夢想

No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent to pass judgment on that subject. Since political know-how is a matter, not of adhering to technical rules, but of insight and style learned trough apprenticeship and experience, only seasoned politicians are competent to judge whether a particular political policy is fair to all.
A major weakness of the argument is that it
--LSAT4 NO.11
(A) relies on a generalization about the characteristic that makes someone competent to pass judgment
(B) fails to give specific examples to illustrate how political know-how can be acquired
(C) uses the term "apprenticeship" to describe what is seldom a formalized relationship
(D) equates political know-how with understanding the social implications of political policies
(E) assumes that when inexperienced politicians set policy they are guided by the advice of more experienced politicians
Key: E
政治知识要通过实习和经验积累才能得到。所以只有有经验的政客才能判断政策是否公平。

B. how political know-how can be acquired 题干已经说明了政治知识要通过实习和经验才能获得 这是肯定正确的说法 所以不用要specific examples来说明啊。
E. 说出了关于apprenticeship的assumption。

superbat28

看来不需要我咯？~其实我也不是很明白><
我觉得daisy你这些题好难啊T T

daisyの小夢想

看来不需要我咯？~其实我也不是很明白><
我觉得daisy你这些题好难啊T T

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/9/11 17:06:30)

TAT 是lsat题 呜 我一个下午就看了这4题逻辑==

superbat28

看来不需要我咯？~其实我也不是很明白><
我觉得daisy你这些题好难啊T T

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/9/11 17:06:30)

TAT 是lsat题 呜 我一个下午就看了这4题逻辑==

-- by 会员 daisyの小夢想 (2011/9/11 17:09:30)

话说，我最近也找到了个网站。。那个网站上的逻辑题也小变态- -。。。弄得我有些崩啊溃~~~

纳丁Cat

No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent to pass judgment on that subject. Since political know-how is a matter, not of adhering to technical rules, but of insight and style learned trough apprenticeship and experience, only seasoned politicians are competent to judge whether a particular political policy is fair to all.
A major weakness of the argument is that it
--LSAT4 NO.11
(A) relies on a generalization about the characteristic that makes someone competent to pass judgment
(B) fails to give specific examples to illustrate how political know-how can be acquired
(C) uses the term "apprenticeship" to describe what is seldom a formalized relationship
(D) equates political know-how with understanding the social implications of political policies
(E) assumes that when inexperienced politicians set policy they are guided by the advice of more experienced politicians
Key: E
政治知识要通过实习和经验积累才能得到。所以只有有经验的政客才能判断政策是否公平。

B. how political know-how can be acquired 题干已经说明了政治知识要通过实习和经验才能获得 这是肯定正确的说法 所以不用要specific examples来说明啊。
E. 说出了关于apprenticeship的assumption。

-- by 会员 daisyの小夢想 (2011/9/11 16:51:13)

assumes that when inexperienced politicians set policy they are guided by the advice of more experienced politicians
这个argument的一个错误是，假设了当一个没有经验的政客 指定政策时，他们被有经验的政客的建议 指导。

说假设了什么，但是文中没有说什么制定政策的事啊。。。

Daisy。。再点拨下啊