ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: tonytong
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 9月9日 北京 晚场 我的痛苦与反思 +狗狗 感谢CD

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:01:55 | 只看该作者
你的意思是你每题都点一遍ABCDE,然后再点答案????
-- by 会员 deyingfan (2011/9/10 9:54:23)


嗯~我看一个就会点~~因为平时练习怕看叉了,所有养成了这个坏习惯!
22#
发表于 2011-9-10 10:02:42 | 只看该作者
请问楼主劳工组织是*62、African American
这篇吗?
23#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:03:08 | 只看该作者
很多时候答案都是未知
或许期待中的结局很美好
可是现实却很残酷
不是每个人都能轻轻松松的实现理想
但是上的确给了我们更多一次的磨练
让我们学会了更加坚强~
继续努力吧
-- by 会员 perthyllll (2011/9/10 9:55:58)


谢谢~~~我会继续努力的~~CDer们真的很NICE!!!
24#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:03:40 | 只看该作者
请问楼主劳工组织是*62、African American
这篇吗?
-- by 会员 kelly1987 (2011/9/10 10:02:42)


不是~~在下面帖子的考古里~我已经贴出!
25#
发表于 2011-9-10 10:03:49 | 只看该作者
pat pat....楼主加油啊。。。

另GWD 劳工组织找不到啊。
-- by 会员 zy04215 (2011/9/10 9:38:59)






就是阅读JJ的第62篇吧
-- by 会员 XYXB (2011/9/10 9:40:57)



不是,62是CIO,这篇是另一篇 ALL AFFL那篇,我新补充的~~谢谢版主~
-- by 会员 tonytong (2011/9/10 9:46:34)



安慰lz一下,跟我第一次考试一样,感觉极好,jj都见过了,出来也是500+
我个人感觉可能是前10道题没把握住
还有机经只是参考,未必是最终的标准正确答案,到了考场上还是需要有自己的判断的
不能看见机经题就点答案,控制pace,必须看完整个题,确认一遍jj答案是正确的。

希望lz再接再厉,下次取得好成绩吧:)

ps,lz说的阅读是哪一篇啊?不是黑人工会的?
我挨个翻了gwd啊,没找到你说的那个
能不能麻烦你把你说的那个传到附件上?
谢谢了,麻烦你:)
26#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:04:40 | 只看该作者
还有你前10题配的JJ少吧? 拿准的也少嘛?
-- by 会员 deyingfan (2011/9/10 9:55:25)


JJ还行,阅读逻辑中了!拿不准就一道逻辑,因为JJ也不详,那题~
27#
发表于 2011-9-10 10:05:45 | 只看该作者
我也遇到过楼主的情况。总结过可能的原因

1.变体,往往逻辑把weaken改成support就完全不一样了,阅读也是,会有些题目的变体,有些不易发现
2.前10题的好坏.
3.语法可能错的多了.
4.难题库什么的我就觉得是在扯淡,我原来逻辑两道黑体题,阅读两篇两屏的大长篇,也是500+。纠结这个没有意义,认真做好每道题才是考场上要做的。

最后要相信自己,不行就再来,保持心态,有很多人都是这么过来的,取得了成功,别放弃
28#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:05:46 | 只看该作者
pat pat....楼主加油啊。。。

另GWD 劳工组织找不到啊。
-- by 会员 zy04215 (2011/9/10 9:38:59)







就是阅读JJ的第62篇吧
-- by 会员 XYXB (2011/9/10 9:40:57)




不是,62是CIO,这篇是另一篇 ALL AFFL那篇,我新补充的~~谢谢版主~
-- by 会员 tonytong (2011/9/10 9:46:34)




安慰lz一下,跟我第一次考试一样,感觉极好,jj都见过了,出来也是500+
我个人感觉可能是前10道题没把握住
还有机经只是参考,未必是最终的标准正确答案,到了考场上还是需要有自己的判断的
不能看见机经题就点答案,控制pace,必须看完整个题,确认一遍jj答案是正确的。

希望lz再接再厉,下次取得好成绩吧:)

ps,lz说的阅读是哪一篇啊?不是黑人工会的?
我挨个翻了gwd啊,没找到你说的那个
能不能麻烦你把你说的那个传到附件上?
谢谢了,麻烦你:)
-- by 会员 one1day (2011/9/10 10:03:49)


版主,在这个帖子的下面我已经贴出了,版主查收~~不麻烦!我们是CDer~~~~是一家人~~~
29#
发表于 2011-9-10 10:06:32 | 只看该作者
加油楼主!
30#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 10:06:51 | 只看该作者
In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States.  The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives.  Labor activists countered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs.

    The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy.  AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL), an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws.  Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers.

    Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions:  the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers.  AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power.  The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.  That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

    Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions.  Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures.  This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-27 03:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部