For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.
(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.
(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.
(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.
(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site. 答案是 C 这里我觉得A B也有加强的效果的。我一开始是选A的。 后来我仔细看发现他要的是most strongly support 原文里有提到 idling 建停车场的目的 就是为了减少 idling 产生的exhaust 所以相应most strongly 应该是C 不知道各位NN我这样理解对不对 考试的时候时间紧 看到一个对的马上就 confirm了 除了全看完,有什么办法可以避免这样的情况啊。 求教 另求prep cr详解
|