- UID
- 557851
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-8-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
刚刚看了一下越度狗,然后发现了acid那道题,一战是在519,当月越度狗里也有这道题并且是自己总结的,一片文,几道题,没想到这次又有,such a surprise!!九月二战希望有个好成绩..大家一起加油嘞~
1.1.2 Lactic acid *第一段,1922年有个诺贝尔的理论,人劳累,是因为肌肉释放的酸达到极限,从而让肌肉休息。 第二段,不是这样,加拿大的科学家有异议,因为加拿大的研究人员发现在海拔高的地方运动员感觉疲劳, 但那个acid并不多。而南非的科学家取出反例,在一种特定的情况下(这种情况可以导致肌肉释放的酸不会大幅增加),对运动员研究发现他们疲劳的时候酸的含量很低,30%的肌肉已经休息了。虽然这些运动员说他们已经很累,达到极限了。 第三段,科学家们就提出假设来解决这个问题,1922年有个诺贝尔的理论是部分正确的,肌肉fatigue不一定是acid的原因(也有acid的原因),有可能是大脑控制各种resource发现你要不行了,然后就给你个信号说你不行了,但是其实你还是行的,说其实Fatigue其实是一种大脑主观的保护机制,来防止肌肉运行过度,而且这个解释可以解释老的理论和新的发现其实并不矛盾。 1、最后一段说其实第一段的那个theory不是完全的错,但是真正决定什么时候stopthe muscle function的是neural system。所以这个过程是subjective而不是Objective(有道题问了这个)。 2、问第二段作者提cannada那个研究有什么作用 3、问题考了一个是最后一段的作用 给第二段的现象一个科学模型?总结了前面 4、问题,main idea。如果人要控制疲劳那么应该怎么做?训练自己,让自己对疲劳没感觉。 5、以总结题为主 6、第2段澳大利亚科学家说得第一段的内容不对暗示着神马,然后选项有说是神马肌肉导致了疲劳等 注意highlight的部分 Interestingly —or unnervingly, depending on how you look at it— some researchers are uncovering evidence thatStanovnik’s rule of thumb might beright. A spate of recent studies has contributed to growing support for the notion that theorigins and controls of fatigue liepartly, if not mostly, within the brain and the central nervous system. The new research puts freshweight to the hoary coaching cliché: youonly think you’re tired.Fromthe time of Hippocrates, the limits of human exertion were thought to reside in the muscles themselves,a hypothesis that was established in1922 with the Nobel Prize-winning work of Dr. A.V. Hill. The theory went like this: workingmuscles, pushed to their limit,accumulated lactic acid.When concentrations of lactic acid reached a certain level, so the argumentwent, the muscles could no longerfunction. Muscles contained an ‘‘automatic brake,’’ Hill wrote,‘‘carefully adjusted bynature.’’Researchers, however, have long noted a link between neurological disorders and athletic potential. In the late1800’s, the pioneering French doctor Philippe Tissié observed thatphobias and epilepsy could be beneficialfor athletic training. A few decades later, the German surgeon August Bier measured the spontaneous long jump of a mentally disturbed patient, noting that itcompared favorably to the existing worldrecord. These types of exertions seemed to defy the notion of built-in muscular limits and, Biernoted, were made possible by‘‘powerfulmental stimuli and the simultaneous elimination of inhibitions.’’Questions about the muscle-centered model came up again in 1989when Canadian researchers published theresults of an experiment called Operation Everest II, in which athletes did heavy exercise in altitude chambers. The athletes reachedexhaustion despite the fact that theirlactic-acid concentrations remained comfortably low. Fatigue, it seemed, might be caused bysomething else.In 1999, three physiologists from the University of Cape TownMedical School in South Africa took the next step.They worked a group of cyclists to exhaustionduring a 62-mile laboratory ride and measured, via electrodes, the percentage of leg muscles they were using atthe fatigue limit. If standard theorieswere true, they reasoned, the bodyshould recruit more muscle fibers as it approached exhaustion — a natural compensation for tired, weakeningmuscles.Instead, the researchers observed the opposite result. As the riders approached complete fatigue, the percentageof active muscle fibers decreased, untilthey were using only about 30 percent. Even as the athletes felt they were giving their all, thereality was that more of their muscleswere at rest.Was the brain purposely holding back the body?‘‘It was as if the brain was playinga trick on the body, to save it,’’saysTimothy Noakes, head of the Cape Towngroup. ‘‘Which makes a lot of sense, ifyou think about it. In fatigue, it onlyfeels like we’re going to die. The actual physiological risks that fatigue represents are essentiallytrivial.’’From this,Noakes and his colleagues concluded that A.V. Hill had been right about the automatic brake, butwrong about its location.They postulated the existence of what they called acentral governor:a neural system that monitors carbohydrate stores, thelevels of glucose and oxygen in theblood, the rates of heat gain and loss, and work rates. The governor’s job is to hold our bodies safely back from the brink of collapse by creatingpainful sensations that we interpret asunendurable muscle fatigue.Fatigue,the researchers argue, is less an objective event than a subjective emotion —the brain’s clever,self-interested attempt to scare youinto stopping.The way past fatigue, then, is to return the favor: to fool the brain by lying to it,distracting it or even provoking it.(That said, mental gamesmanship can never overcome a basic lack of fitness. As Noakes says, thebody always holds veto power.)‘‘Athletesand coaches already do a lot of this instinctively,’’Noakes says.‘‘What is a coach, after all, but a technique for overcoming the governor?’’Thegovernor theory is far from conclusive, but some scientists are focusing on a walnut-size area in the frontportion of the brain called the anteriorcingulate cortex. This has been linked to a host of core functions, including handling pain,creating emotion and playing a key rolein what’s known loosely as willpower. Sir Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA, thought theanterior cingulate cortex to be the seatof the soul. In the sports world, perhaps no soul relies on it more than Jure Robic’s.Some people‘‘have the abilityto reprocess the pain signal,’’ saysDaniel Galper, a senior researcher in the psychiatry department at the University of Texas SouthwesternMedical Center at Dallas. ‘‘It’s not that they don’t feel the pain; theyjust shift their brain dynamics andalter their perception of reality so the pain matters less. It’s basically a purposeful hallucination.’’Noakes and his colleaguesspeculate that the central governor theory holds the potential to explain not just feats of stamina but also their opposite: chronic fatigue syndrome (amalfunctioning, overactive governor, inthis view).Moreover, the governor theory makes evolutionary sense. Animals whose brains safeguarded an emergency stash of physical reserves mightwell have survived at a higher rate thananimals that could drain their fuel tanks at will.The theory would also seem toexplain a sports landscape in which ultra-endurance events have gone from being considered medically hazardous to something perilously close toroutine. The Ironman triathlon in Hawaii —a 2.4-mile swim,112-mile bike ride and marathon-lengthrun—was the ne plus ultra in endurance in the 1980’s, buthas now been topped by the Ultraman, which is more than twice as long. Once obscure, the genre knownas adventure racing, which includes500-plus-mile wilderness races like Primal Quest, has grown to more than 400 events each year.Ultramarathoners, defined as those whoparticipate in running events exceeding the official marathon distance of 26.2 miles, now numbersome 15,000 in theUnited Statesalone. The underlying physics have not changed, but rather our sense of possibility. Athletic culture, likeRobic, has discovered a way to tweak itscollective governor. |
|