ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 10317|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD 4-22 阅读

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-5 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

请教GWD 4-22 阅读

Q22 to Q25:


      Many managers are influenced by


       dangerous myths about pay that lead


       to counterproductive decisions about


Line       how their companies compensate


  (5)      employees.  One such myth is that


labor rates, the rate per hour paid to


workers, are identical with labor costs,


the money spent on labor in relation to


the productivity of the labor force.


(10)      This myth leads to the assumption that


a company can simply lower its labor


costs by cutting wages.  But labor


costs and labor rates are not in fact


the same:  one company could pay


(15)      its workers considerably more than


another and yet have lower labor


costs if that company’s productivity


were higher due to the talent of its


workforce, the efficiency of its work


(20)      processes, or other factors.  The


       confusion of costs with rates per-


       sists partly because labor rates are


a convenient target for managers who


want to make an impact on their com-


(25)      pany’s budgets.  Because labor rates


are highly visible, managers can easily


compare their company’s rates with


those of competitors.  Furthermore,


labor rates often appear to be a


(30)      company’s most malleable financial


variable:  cutting wages appears an


easier way to control costs than such


       options as reconfiguring work pro-


cesses or altering product design.


(35)          The myth that labor rates and labor


costs are equivalent is supported by


business journalists, who frequently


confound the two.  For example, prom-


inent business journals often remark on


(40)     the “high” cost of German labor, citing


as evidence the average amount paid


to German workers.  The myth is also


perpetuated by the compensation-


consulting industry, which has its own


(45)      incentives to keep such myths alive.


First, although some of these con-


sulting firms have recently broadened


their practices beyond the area of


compensation, their mainstay con-


(50)      tinues to be advising companies on


changing their compensation prac-


tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


performance can be improved in


some other way than by altering its


(55)      pay system may be empirically cor-


rect but contrary to the consultants’


interests.  Furthermore, changes


to the compensation system may


appear to be simpler to implement


(60)      than changes to other aspects of an


organization, so managers are more


likely to find such advice from con-


sultants palatable.  Finally, to the


extant that changes in compensation


(65)      create new problems, the consultants


will continue to have work solving the


problems that result from their advice.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q22:


The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?


              



  • It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.

  • It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.

  • It tends to result in decreased labor rates but increased labor costs.

  • It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are less visible than changes to work processes would be.

  • It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.

  • 给的答案是A,我觉得应该是E.


    A不对:文中并没有说在compensation systems上没能产生the intended changes,而是说改变了薪酬系统并没有解决企业的实际问题。



    文中红色标出的部分说明:正是因为consulting firms were narrowly specialized,所以有些问题其实不是compensation systems的问题,他们为了自己的利益也把它作为compensation systems的问题来处理。所以,如果说:It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.




    请指点!

    沙发
    发表于 2004-7-5 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

    同意E. 不过理由是你红色标出的前一句。

    First, although some of these consulting firms have recently broadened their practices beyond the area of compensation, their mainstay continues to be advising companies on changing their compensation practices.

    板凳
    发表于 2005-7-6 17:10:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用nowait在2005-4-8 0:40:00的发言:

    Question 22, i think the answer should be E.


    Consultants mentioned in the article are from compensation consulting firms. By giving businesses advice of changing compensation, these consulting firms can benefit from various aspects. However if these firms are not narrowly specialized in only compensation consulting (what E says), advice might not only rest on the compensation change strategy.

    供参考
    地板
    发表于 2005-9-14 10:21:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用rhod在2004-7-5 22:39:00的发言:

    同意E. 不过理由是你红色标出的前一句。


    First, although some of these consulting firms have recently broadened their practices beyond the area of compensation, their mainstay continues to be advising companies on changing their compensation practices.


    rod跟我想法一样不过我第一次是做错的,后来不看答案仔细想想觉得是E,一看答案也不意外。这道题我觉得最混淆的就是A和E两项,不过E跟明显,以rod那句提几个关键词为例:“broadened their practices ”“beyond the area of compensation”"mainstay" 这些讲的都是这些咨询公司专业化的狭窄。

    5#
    发表于 2006-8-22 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
    不对不对,仔细看这句话的意思是:尽管咨询公司扩展了他们的领域,但仍然会建议只是降低工资。而E选项的意思是:如果咨询公司的领域不是那么狭窄,情况就可能不一样了。这两个意思是刚好相反的。

    但我也不知道到底该选哪个,好象都不对。
    6#
    发表于 2006-10-11 17:15:00 | 只看该作者

    lz涂红那句的意思是:改进而不是变动xx是正确的,但与consultants’

    interests相反——〉consultant是希望变动,而不是改进,不是跟A吻合么?

    欢迎讨论

    7#
    发表于 2006-10-11 18:07:00 | 只看该作者
    我也觉得应该是E,因为1方面E的意思比较接近(毕竟文中的说法比较隐秘),另一方面,根据对应原则,原文有broaden,那么选项中的narrowly就可以对应了。
    8#
    发表于 2006-10-14 22:13:00 | 只看该作者

    2ND段落分析的是为什么咨询业坚持这个MYTH,是因为他们为了自己的动机(incentive),他们只是表示改变pay system而不是其他更好的方法

    从这里可以理解A表达的意思:没有带来期望的效果

    9#
    发表于 2006-12-26 17:32:00 | 只看该作者

    我觉得A和E都不对啊。

    首先,关于A,It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems. 应该是无法达到期望的效果,无法达到降低labor cost的目的,而不是无法改变labor rate

    关于E,都已经说了although some of these consulting firms have recently broadened their practices beyond the area of

    compensation, their mainstay continues to be advising companies on changing their compensation practices.所以E肯定不对。

    为什么没有人认为是C啊?我觉得C挺好的呀,Consulting 虽然建议降低labor rate,但往往达不到预计效果。什么是预计的效果?就是降低了的labor cost呀。所以labor rate降低了但labor cost上升了。

    大家说呢?

    10#
    发表于 2007-5-14 01:19:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用kennypl在2006-10-14 22:13:00的发言:

    2ND段落分析的是为什么咨询业坚持这个MYTH,是因为他们为了自己的动机(incentive),他们只是表示改变pay system而不是其他更好的方法

    从这里可以理解A表达的意思:没有带来期望的效果

    不是效果,而是现象.

    the intended changes in companies’compensation systems不就是说"预料的compensation系统的变化吗",只要manager接受consultant的建议,就一定会有变化,只不过没有达到预期的效果而已,所以A站不住脚. 而E却能在文中找到依据.

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-6 07:38
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部