ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: xx2004
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]885 SecE-23

[精华] [复制链接]
61#
发表于 2008-3-23 11:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用niuroumian在2008-3-21 22:18:00的发言:

谓语肯定要跟着主语了,主语是a phenonmenon, 谓语当然是is 了,waves of  ******是一种情况,而不是很多浪花,没有矛盾。

不过NN说的all the students each have a dream ,感到奇怪, 这句话本身就是错误的吧,all the students each has a dream 。 ?

求解

这句话主语是all the students 而each是同位语,主谓一致,所以谓语要用have。谓语用复数还是单数和宾语、同位语没有关系,主语和谓语一致就好了。
62#
发表于 2008-4-12 11:43:00 | 只看该作者

个人想法

第一层关系:A new phenomena,[主语] is[谓语] 主谓单复数一致  waves of vendors and beggars [宾语]

第二层关系:visible at Managua's major intersections [形容词短语,后置定语,修饰主语] many of them children [独立主格,修饰vendors and beggars] who...[定语从句,修饰vendors and beggars]

另外应该注意,

名词+独立主格+定语从句,则定语从句修饰名词,本句就是这种情况
名词+同位语+定语从句,则存在就近原则,定语从句修饰同位语

63#
发表于 2008-8-5 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用qsrlw在2004-12-9 5:34:00的发言:
---------(C) A new phenomenon visible at Managua’s major intersections is waves of vendors and beggars, many of them children, who           [mob cars at the stoplights]

STONEREN:  "4-which include many clildren and mob cars at the stoplights,定从(原文意图)修饰前置名词vendors and beggars;A的错误在2部分(定从n, + which be + a.一般情况下可以被a. + n.替代【注:除了逻辑或平行结构需要】);3部分主谓一致;4部分which定从的指代不明确,不如C中用同位语+明确定从who好。"

Thank Stoneren for your explanation. But I still do not understand the last part of C. When I put it in the sentence.I am confused by " many of them children,who"   how to connect  [ mob cars at the stoplights.  In meantime, what's the meaning about " many of them children",bty, could u please tell me the relationship between them and children?  Thank you very much

beggars = many of them = children

逗号后面的many of them 紧跟同位语children结构很紧凑,共同修饰beggars,如果用many of them are children稍显啰嗦

64#
发表于 2008-8-29 05:38:00 | 只看该作者
我认为many of them children是插入语
65#
发表于 2008-9-1 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

我想请问NN一个问题, water and books 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数? food and water 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数?

books and food谓语动词应该用单数还是复数? book and desk 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数?books and desk 呢?

66#
发表于 2008-9-16 14:20:00 | 只看该作者

我想的比较简单。

我觉得这句话的结构就是sth(A) is sth(B)的结构。a new phenomenon is weaves.。

然后weaves连接of+名词,表示限定或修饰,后面的many of them children是插入语,who引导定于从句修饰beggers。

67#
发表于 2008-9-27 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用myhappyyang在2008-9-1 23:21:00的发言:

我想请问NN一个问题, water and books 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数? food and water 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数?

books and food谓语动词应该用单数还是复数? book and desk 谓语动词应该用单数还是复数?books and desk 呢?

A and B 结构, 谓语动词都用复数

68#
发表于 2008-11-4 00:36:00 | 只看该作者
vendor就是小贩~~参考走遍美国第二单元有个卖热狗的小贩就是vendor
69#
发表于 2008-12-1 15:46:00 | 只看该作者

A new phenomena, which is visible at Managua’s major intersections, are waves of vendors and beggars, which include many children and mob cars at the stoplights.

我理解的是:which修饰phenomena,"are"不对,应改为is,这样主谓一致。第二个which修饰 vendors and beggers. 原句中可以看出include和mob是平行并列形式,发出者是vendors and beggers.(所以C中who指代的是vendor and beggers )

我的问题是:如果改为 a new phenomena , which is visible at Managua's magor intersection, is waves of vendor and beggars,who include many children and mob cars at the stoplights. 这样可不可以呢,会有歧义吗?我没看出,

或者改为 ......vendor and beggars, including many children and mobbing cars in the stoplights. 这样可以吗?我不太清楚,如果不对,是因为,改为including....的话,including其修饰主语是phenomena吗?

谢谢~

70#
发表于 2008-12-3 23:10:00 | 只看该作者

咦?这帖子沉淀太久了吗?没有人回答我。。。大家快看那

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 20:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部