ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: xx2004

[求助]885 SecE-23

[精华] [复制链接]
发表于 2006-4-26 12:09:00 | 显示全部楼层
我知道MOB的意思了,在这里他作为一个VERB,表示围住:聚集在一起的和拥挤或气愤的人群,尤其是气愤地或极端热情地:To crowd around and jostle or annoy, especially in anger or excessive enthusiasm:
发表于 2006-4-28 13:15:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用colacat在2005-2-6 9:23:00的发言:

who 修饰的是beggars, 不是vendors


vendor是自动售卖机,就是路边那个大箱子,都见过吧。


还有,关于wave作为名词的解释是


n 1: one of a series of ridges that moves across the surface of a liquid (especially across a large body of water) [syn: moving ridge]


2: a movement like that of an ocean wave; "a wave of settlers"; "troops advancing in waves"


3: (physics) a movement up and down or back and forth [syn: undulation]


4: something that rises rapidly; "a wave of emotion swept over him"; "there was a sudden wave of buying before the market closed"; "a wave of conservatism in the country led by the hard right" ---这句中,显然是这个意思。


5: the act of signaling by a movement of the hand [syn: waving, wafture]


6: a hairdo that creates undulations in the hair


7: an undulating curve [syn: undulation]


8: a persistent and widespread unusual weather condition (especially of unusual temperatures)


9: a member of the women's reserve of the United States Navy; originally organized during World War II but now no longer a separate branch [syn: Wave]


Thanks for the explanation.

Howeverm there is a fault I would like to point out.


Vendor应该是指路边的那种兜售东西的小贩。就像北京秀水街外面,上海襄阳路外面兜售皮包和手表的小贩。

Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter

发表于 2006-4-28 13:18:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用hitler999在2005-6-21 19:54:00的发言:


有两点不同意,第一,vendors指小商贩而不是自动售货机(美国也没有一建国就有自动售货机啊),第二,who修饰的是 vendors and beggars,而不是children。



Totally agree


Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter

发表于 2006-4-28 13:27:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用jjll在2005-9-30 20:34:00的发言:


精辟!

谓语和宾语无所谓主谓一致,所以可以是a phenomenon ... is waves of ...

(A)中的phenomena也是错的。


All the students each have a bright future.


为什么不说


All the students each have bright future.


为什么宾语要用单数?NN指点。


Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter

发表于 2006-5-2 02:04:00 | 显示全部楼层

不理解为什么这里可以用 many of them children


我不能确定这是不是独立主格


独立主格不是应该


名词(代词)+现在分词、过去分词;
名词(代词)+形容词;
名词(代词)+副词;
名词(代词)+不定式;
名词(代词) +介词短语构成。 

似乎没有 名词+名词


请教NN,3Q

发表于 2006-9-5 09:42:00 | 显示全部楼层

我的理解:

vendor 应该还是小贩的意思,自动贩卖机在美国是vending machine。

vendors and beggars,小贩和乞丐,非常对称。

many of them children,是插入语,who修饰vendors and beggars。

choice C : A new phenomenon (visible at Managua’s major intersections) is waves of vendors and beggars, {many of them children}, who mob cars at the stoplights.

同意

我知道MOB的意思了,在这里他作为一个VERB,表示围住:聚集在一起的和拥挤或气愤的人群,尤其是气愤地或极端热情地:To crowd around and jostle or annoy, especially in anger or excessive enthusiasm:

发表于 2006-10-13 23:55:00 | 显示全部楼层

看到帖子,我想请教:phenomenon和phenomena有何区别?

发表于 2006-11-8 14:44:00 | 显示全部楼层

只存在主谓搭配,主语同位语、同位语谓语、还有谓语和宾语是没有搭配关系的,所以is waves没有错

发表于 2006-11-19 10:46:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用rebeccashally在2006-10-13 23:55:00的发言:

看到帖子,我想请教:phenomenon和phenomena有何区别?

Phenomenon 是这个名词唯一的单数形式; phenomena 是常用的复数形式。 Phenomenons 在非科技性的文章也可当作复数使用, 其意思是:“不寻常的事或人”:
They were phenomenons in the history of music.
发表于 2007-4-2 14:56:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用qsrlw在2004-12-9 5:34:00的发言:
---------(C) A new phenomenon visible at Managua’s major intersections is waves of vendors and beggars, many of them children, who           [mob cars at the stoplights]

STONEREN:  "4-which include many clildren and mob cars at the stoplights,定从(原文意图)修饰前置名词vendors and beggars;A的错误在2部分(定从n, + which be + a.一般情况下可以被a. + n.替代【注:除了逻辑或平行结构需要】);3部分主谓一致;4部分which定从的指代不明确,不如C中用同位语+明确定从who好。"

Thank Stoneren for your explanation. But I still do not understand the last part of C. When I put it in the sentence.I am confused by " many of them children,who"   how to connect  [ mob cars at the stoplights.  In meantime, what's the meaning about " many of them children",bty, could u please tell me the relationship between them and children?  Thank you very much

Because one sentence can have only one subject. It  sounds like properer to add a "are" in "many of them children,who". But if thus,the sentence would have double subjects.One is "A new phenomenon" and another is "many of them ". Therefore,"many of them " is used for modifier. It equals "many of which are". The subordinate clause inducted by who decorates children.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 14:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部