以下是引用anyname在2005-5-9 14:07:00的发言:
同意杂志不能作为GMAT标准,只是见得太多,所以拿来提醒一下:我们说increase to y from x不unidiomatic是不是有点武断了。GMAT到底有说increase to y from x一定不对么?如有,请指出。如果没有,我们可不可以理解"to y"和increase的关系本来也很紧密,紧跟其后,然后“from x”作状语,也很清晰流畅呢?另外,E不能算是双重所有格吧。双重所有格是象这样的吧:A's B's C。
雙重所有格可以這樣表示 A of B's 在OG裡這是不好的用法 請看OG#202的解釋 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=49367
202. After the Civil War, contemporaries of Harriet Tubman's maintained that she has all of the qualities of a great leader: coolness in the face of danger, an excellent sense of strategy, and an ability to plan in minute detail. (A) Tubman's maintained that she has (B) Tubman's maintain that she had (C) Tubman's have maintained that she had (D) Tubman maintained that she had (E) Tubman had maintained that she has
In choice D, the best answer, the phrase contemporaries of Harriet Tubman presents a complete possessive without adding an apostrophe (e.g., Tubman's). Choices A, B, and C use a redundant possessive: contemporaries of Harriet Tubman's. All choices other than D have errors in verb tense. Because the sentence describes essentially simultaneous actions completed in the past, the simple past tense forms maintained and had are required. Thus, the present tense forms has and maintain are incorrect in A, B, and E, as are . the present perfect have maintained in C and the past perfect had maintained in E.
另外我也找到了一個帖子(OG#165解釋的第一個帖子)說明雙重所有格 請看以下 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=3403&id=3403&page=1&skin=0&Star=2
OG並無法武斷說明to...from是unidiomatic,但是(A)即from...to,考試時from...to我從句意感受不到必須要強調為to...from,所以應該會尊重原題(A)的決定,保留from...to的樣子。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-9 2:28:29编辑过] |