ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: fox0923
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【每日阅读训练——速度3系列】【速度3-2】&【越障3-2】

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2011-7-28 22:07:34 | 只看该作者
TS,引出问题 The refusal of some countries to extradite personsaccused or convicted of terrorist act has focused attention on the problemscaused by the political offense exception to extradition. KWExtradition is theprocess by which one countryreturns an accused or convicted person found within its borders to anothercountry for trial or punishment.  此处略读Under the political offense exception, therequested state may, if it considers the crime to be a “political offense,” deny extradition tothe requesting state.
第一段说,refuse terroristextradition 的主要问题是 political exception,因为political就会被deny.
Protection of political offenses is arecent addition to the ancient practice of extradition. 时间对比It isthe result of two fundamental changes that occurred as European monarchies werereplaced by representative governments. First, thesegovernments began to reject what had been a primary intent of extradition, toexpedite the return of political offenders, and instead sought to protectdissidents fleeing despotic regimes. Second, countries began to contend that they had no legal ormoral duty toextradite offenders without specific agreements creating such obligations. 全部略读,记得此处有两个change并列As extradition laws subsequently developedthrough internationaltreaties, the political offense exception gradually became an accepted principleamong Western nations. 后来的发展 TS1
第二段,论述 political offense exception的起源。
There is no international consensus, however, as to what constitutes a political offense. 转折+ts2For analytical purposes illegal politicalconduct has traditionally been divided into two categories. 原因,以下可略读,两个 CATEGORIES并列    “Pure” political offenses are acts perpetrateddirectly against the government, such as treason and espionage. 可能出EXCEPT题,跳过Thesecrimes are generally recognized as nonextraditable, even if not expressly excluded from extraditionby the applicable treaty. Incontrast, 来对比了common crimes, such as murder, assault, and robbery, EXCEPT 题,跳过are generally extraditable.   转折 However, there are somecommon crimes that are so inseparable from a political act that the entire offense is regarded as political.These crimes, which are called “relative” 引号关键词 political offenses, aregenerally nonextraditable.转折 Despite the widespread acceptance of these analytic constructs, thedistinctions are moreacademic than meaningful. 态度When it comes to realcases, there is noagreement aboutwhat transforms a common crime into a political l offense and about whetherterrorist acts fall within the protection of the exception. 并列&略读Most terrorists claim that their acts do fallunder this protection.  结论
Nationsof the world must now balance the competing needs of political freedom andinternational public order.  
TS 解决方法 It is time to reexamine thepolitical offense exception, as international terrorism eradicates the criticaldistinctions between political offenses and nonpolitical crimes. 从句略读The only only,警觉)rationaland attainable objectiveof the exception is toprotect the requested person against unfair treatment by the requestingcountry. The international community needs to find an alternative to the political offense exceptionthat would protect the rights of requested persons and yet not offer terroristsimmunity from criminal liability. 结论,具体方法可略读,因为同大TS


42#
发表于 2011-7-28 22:08:19 | 只看该作者
我觉得是问题解决型啊。。抓抓。嗯。题目分析地这么全, 我就看你的了。哈哈。
43#
发表于 2011-7-28 22:21:02 | 只看该作者
你们都分析这么全。。啊……
我一般都是花5,6分钟好好读文章。。什么都不略过。。然后开始做题。。
但是做题也就控制在4分钟左右。。。
44#
发表于 2011-7-28 22:22:34 | 只看该作者
略过就是快快地看。。。我是理论型,实践。。很差啊。。
45#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-28 22:32:04 | 只看该作者
原来是这这样啊,谢谢抓抓对题型的分析,对于作对的主旨题的E选项还理解错了,虽然做对了,可还是存在对文章的不理解。
46#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-28 22:40:21 | 只看该作者
to fox & bat :
http://forum.chasedream.com/Download/thread-102119-1-1.html  
新东方这里下,这里下。免费的,免费的。
我觉得入门挺好的。。。我是从一无所知,看这个开始的。嗯,如果你已经入门了,就不需要了。因为要看挺久的,一天搞定应该没问题。没时间也可以看看他的讲义。  我觉得,可以把逻辑当做小阅读。

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Preparation/thread-519351-1-1.html
lawyer方法这里下,这里下。免费的,免费的。哈哈,不过,lawyer的方法要自己做了题,总结,再看他说的。不过。毛毛姐的分类和分析,有点小错。。。NO OFFENCE。   (毕竟,我还是都看毛毛姐提供的资料,帮助很大)

我觉得,逻辑,关键是要有自己的方法。规律性很强的,分类看题。总结。嗯。就会超脱的。。


我的阅读,阅读。。   你们有啥建议整整阅读啊。。



再补点我自己的看法哦。。我觉得可以归纳题看一遍,  然后 加强,削弱以及假设一起看。  最后是剩下乱七八糟的作用和BOLDFACE之类的。嗯。
-- by 会员 kidvii (2011/7/28 21:18:24)



谢谢啦。。一会就去下载。
对于阅读,我也就是用小安的方法对以前做过的OG题不断的复习巩固,以题型一样的来做,而不是以每篇文章的顺序来做。起初是这样,因为我想找出其中的规律,后来做得顺手些了,就有按照文章的顺序来做了,感觉确实有提高。另外我基本上在第二遍复习的时候每一篇文章重读后,都马上写出总结和逻辑提纲,然后再做题,就觉得思路非常清晰。当然在考试的时候是没有这样时间的,所以这也不过是练习的时候让自己更快地进入记忆状态(本人记忆力超差,可能和经常性的multi-tasks有关),不过我现在做verbal分册就没有用这种方法,主要是想知道在时间不允许的情况下可以做对多少题,不过在第二轮复习中肯定会用到。个人觉得reading comp.绝对是时间搭出来的。。。
47#
发表于 2011-7-28 23:02:40 | 只看该作者

抓。。抓。。抓抓~~
12题答案是A。。。嗯。。。
E错在变得more academic than practical value to political dissidents不是political offense exception,而是那个CC和RPO的分割界限。而由此,也就导致了political offense exception的使用超过了其intended use。不知道我说明白没= =
-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/7/28 21:40:34)



 哦哦 也就是说如果把CC当成是RPO了,那就越界超出intended use了,因为intended use就是那个CC和RPO的界限。

48#
发表于 2011-7-28 23:21:18 | 只看该作者
抓。。抓。。抓抓~~
12题答案是A。。。嗯。。。
E错在变得more academic than practical value to political dissidents不是political offense exception,而是那个CC和RPO的分割界限。而由此,也就导致了political offense exception的使用超过了其intended use。不知道我说明白没= =
-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/7/28 21:40:34)





 哦哦 也就是说如果把CC当成是RPO了,那就越界超出intended use了,因为intended use就是那个CC和RPO的界限。

-- by 会员 daisyの小夢想 (2011/7/28 23:02:40)



啊~看来懒得打字还是不行的。。。
我理解的是,首先,各个国家都赞成跟political有关的那种犯罪是不可以引渡的,而普通的CC是可以引渡的。而且一开始,那个political offense exception就只是针对political的犯罪而设立的一种类似“免罪”的条款。
但是,在CC里,又有很多犯罪是和政治密不可分的,所以出现了RPO,尽管RPO的确定原则并不是很清晰,但是各国对于RPO这样的犯罪是当成政治犯罪来对待的,也就是对于RPO各国也认为可以“免罪”,不去实施引渡。
然而,因为RPO和CC的界定是很不practical的,会造成各种争议,所以作者觉得要重新去研究RPO的问题。而且把原先只应适用于政治犯罪的political offense exception也同样适用于RPO,这就造成了beyond the intended use。

应该是这样吧?~
49#
发表于 2011-7-28 23:26:54 | 只看该作者
to bat:
那个~12题我做的时候倒是做对了,订正的时候居然想错了。。好诡异。。说明理解不准确。。
貌似懂了~
50#
发表于 2011-7-28 23:37:24 | 只看该作者
12题又对比了一下原文和选项,so subtle!
原文:“Despite the widespread acceptance of these analytic constructs, the distinctions are more academic than meaningful. When it comes to real cases, there is no agreement about what transforms a common crime into a political offense and about whether terrorist acts fall within the protection of the exception.” 主体是distinctions,而不是extradition.
E选项:这组对比是针对distinctions的,而题干要找的是针对大概念EXTRADITION的。。

以后一定要看清楚强对比的主体是神马!><!
(休息完了继续整CR去..整不完啊整不完...T T)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-9 23:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部