ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2818|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 104题 答案看不懂 求高手

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-19 22:48:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
104.    Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the
location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens
the argument?
(A)    Many customers of Colson's are expected to do
less shopping there than they did before the
SpendLess store opened.
(B)    Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the
central shopping district since Colson's opened
have been discount stores.
(C)    At present, the central shopping district has as
many stores operating in it as it ever had.
(D)    Over the course of the next five years, it is
expected that Goreville's population will grow at
a faster rate than it has for the past several
decades.
(E)    Many stores in the central shopping district sell
types of merchandise that are not available at
either SpendLess or Colson's.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-19 23:36:23 | 只看该作者
答案是不是选B?感觉其他的都跟这题没什么联系
板凳
发表于 2011-7-19 23:52:24 | 只看该作者
我的理解是,作者试图建立这样一个类别推理:
原因:很多竞争不过非打折商店Colson的商店都关门了,但不久在这些关门的商店所在地址开了很多商店。
现状:打折商店G因为竞争不过S要关门了。
推论是:G的商店所在地址很快也会被别的商店取代。

问weaken。如果要两种情况可比,一定是G和S的情况要与C和与其竞争商店的情况一样,现在G和S都是打折商店,如果与C竞争的商店不是非打折(即打折商店),是否可削弱?
地板
发表于 2011-7-20 07:09:01 | 只看该作者
所以你分析了一阵 最后选成了什么
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-20 09:05:57 | 只看该作者
明白了 选B
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 03:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部