ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2191|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

ff135-45

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-13 00:55:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

45. Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.
This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument
A.    relies on information that is far from certain
B.    confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
C.    inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
D.    inappropriately employs language that is vague
E.    takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
       请问this plan(decrease expenditures)原本应该是一个必要条件还是一个充分条件?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-13 01:19:15 | 只看该作者
Premise: The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year.

The plan is a sufficient condtion to decrease spending.

Conclusion: We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

The plan is a necessargy conclution to decrease spending.

BBBBBBBBBBBbb
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-13 10:06:30 | 只看该作者
谢谢!懂了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 06:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部