再问OG-31

leeon

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against
the suggestion above?
A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions
from major donors and general public.
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the
private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.

这道题A是什么意思，请NN翻译一下！谢谢！

chwayne

我不是NN，我试一下：那些寻求废除对开发公园自然资源的限制的人可能会作为成员加入那些私有的环境集团，并逐渐取得那些集团的领导权。

A 是给出了一种极其不利的可能性，如果这些人取得了领导权，那些conservation objectives 就不是be better served，而要被他们开发了，这样反对了原Argument.

leeon

Got it, Thanks!!!

vivienvivid

请问CONSERVATION OBJECT是什么意思 是不是将公园维持下去的目标

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-23 1:26:56编辑过]