ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: pizzahutgg
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 迟来的姨妈,期玲期的狗。

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2011-7-8 11:04:59 | 只看该作者
神记忆啊
12#
发表于 2011-7-8 11:14:33 | 只看该作者
语文乱选也能得25
13#
发表于 2011-7-8 15:13:57 | 只看该作者
语文乱选也能得25
-- by 会员 francislaw (2011/7/8 11:14:33)


乱选也能25?这个乱选的水平很高哦~
安慰下lz,要不收拾下心情再决定是否再战?顺便问句,这个v是开玩笑的吧?
14#
发表于 2011-7-8 15:44:06 | 只看该作者
其实大家都很好奇,是否v能0分,诶,心态。 哈哈。我也有
15#
发表于 2011-7-8 16:01:09 | 只看该作者
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-8 21:45:06 | 只看该作者
跟零分差不多
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-8 21:45:24 | 只看该作者
祝你好运
18#
发表于 2011-7-8 21:56:44 | 只看该作者
怎么回事?
19#
发表于 2011-7-17 16:22:17 | 只看该作者
请lz确认一下裸机是不是这题啊?谢啦

13. 【作家曲目】
问一个作曲家的,说很多作品都归于他,但是后来发现了一个东西,又说不是他的
问:哪一个选项最justify。
Q38: TTGWD4-Q14:
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?
The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer.  Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.  Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.
A、the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
B、the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
C、there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
D、the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise樣本沒有代表性
E、no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
20#
发表于 2011-7-17 22:20:53 | 只看该作者
LZ 上妆了吧,输血满分,V ”0“?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-7 05:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部