ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sdcar2010
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十)Flaw (part 2)

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2011-7-15 16:34:43 | 只看该作者
连AWA一起练习了!!哈哈
12#
发表于 2011-10-31 10:45:18 | 只看该作者
up
13#
发表于 2011-11-3 21:03:32 | 只看该作者
14#
发表于 2012-2-3 04:34:16 | 只看该作者
flaw部分要一气呵成看完啊~~

谢谢sdcar神神~
15#
发表于 2012-2-8 21:49:11 | 只看该作者
给自己加个油,继续研究,感激lz
16#
发表于 2012-3-1 13:52:41 | 只看该作者
thx sdcar!
17#
发表于 2012-3-13 23:16:27 | 只看该作者
[quote]


C) Biased answers
? Example: In the 2008 Presidential primaries, polling critics questioned polls that showed Barack Obama leading Hillary Clinton. They argued that the respondents were likely overstating their support for Obama because they did not want to appear racist.

I did not find some thing like biased answers in the example. Can someone help me?


I think that means the poll result from the respondents is not credible, because the respondents might support Obama for some special considerations(they didn't want to appear racist).
18#
发表于 2012-3-18 19:58:32 | 只看该作者
其实看的有点儿吃力……
19#
发表于 2012-6-14 12:17:24 | 只看该作者
9. Overstating the evidence
? No evidence for a claim does not mean the claim is false.

? No evidence against a claim does not mean the claim is true.
? Some evidence for a claim does not mean it is true.
? Some evidence against a claim does not mean it is false.

I have one question about the last judgement.

I think if one evidence is existed agaisnt a claim, then I can say the claim is false.

20#
发表于 2013-3-25 22:04:50 | 只看该作者
总结得很棒。有的flaw常见到,有的见得比较少。
先留个印象,然后再做题练习!!吼吼
图书馆要关门了,收拾东西回寝再看!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-23 21:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部