ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zj1983
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd11-36

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-9-15 00:45:00 | 只看该作者

wangyu GG,但是这道题的问题是问6-7行的啊,不是应该在附近找么?怎么弄到第三段里面去了/


偶选了A,请指教

22#
发表于 2005-9-29 17:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用v22在2005-9-15 0:45:00的发言:

wangyu GG,但是这道题的问题是问6-7行的啊,不是应该在附近找么?怎么弄到第三段里面去了/


偶选了A,请指教


关键在于提干中disagree的态度,全文的态度只有在三段中出现小的负态度,所以只能去那里了。忍不住说一句真是个n题,变相的主旨还告诉你按照细节来做~~~

      Recent feminist scholarship con-


       cerning the United States in the 1920’s


       challenges earlier interpretations that


Line       assessed the twenties in terms of the


  (5)      unkept “promises” of the women’s


suffrage movement.  This new scholar-最近的妇女研究关于美国在1920年代对于更早解释(评价二十年代根据妇女的选举运动的未有的承诺)的挑战


ship disputes the long-held view that


because a women’s voting bloc did not


materialize after women gained the right


(10)      to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to


produce long-term political gains for


women.  These feminist scholars also  这个新的妇女研究驳斥了长期持有的观点,因为1920年妇女取得了选举权以后,妇女的选举集团并没有形成,所以对于妇女来说选举并没有产生长期的政治利益。


challenge the old view that pronounced


suffrage a failure for not delivering on


(15)      the promise that the women’s vote


would bring about moral, corruption-


free governance.  Asked whether 这些妇女研究着同时也反对了老的观点声称选举并没有传递关于妇女选举应当产生道德无腐败的政府控制的承诺是一个失败。


women’s suffrage was a failure, these


scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-


(20)      century social reformer Jane Addams,


       “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in


       general is failing?”   被问到妇女的选举是否是一个失败,这些研究者举了世纪之交社会改革家ja的话,为什么你们不问问选举在普遍意义上是不是失败的呢?


      In some ways, however, these


scholars still present the 1920’s as a


(25)      period of decline.  After suffrage, they


argue, the feminist movement lost its


cohesiveness, and gender conscious-


ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few


successes could be claimed by fem-


(30)      inist reformers: little could be seen in


the way of legislative victories.在一些方面,然而,这些学者仍然将1920年代作为一个下滑的时期。他们辩驳到在选举以后这些妇女活动失去了它的向心力和衰退的性别意识。在1920年代中期以后,很少的成功能够被女权主义改革者所宣称,很少能够被在立法成功的方面所看到。


      During this decade, however, there


       was intense activism aimed at achiev-


ing increased autonomy for women,


(35)    broadening the spheres within which


they lived their daily lives.  Women’s在这个时期,然而,有密集的目标是达到增加女性自治的活动,开阔了她们日常生活的圈子。


organizations worked to establish


opportunities for women: they strove to


      secure for women the full entitlements


(40)     of citizenship, including the right to hold


office and the right to serve on juries.妇女组织为妇女们创造机会,它们为保护妇女的公民权利而努力,包括任公职的权利和任职司法的权利。


23#
发表于 2005-10-14 14:26:00 | 只看该作者

2段讲妇女运动很少能够在立法成功的方面看到。。


3段讲妇女组织位妇女们创造机会,他们为报户妇女的公民权利而努力,包括任公职的权利和任职司法的权利。


这不是说明了


Q36:


It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the


                        



  1. degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept

  2. degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance

  3. degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement

  4. degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s

  5. accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved








我也了解c是比较原文的大意的意思,但不改词汇重抄似乎不是ets的作风, 而且文中似乎也少了degree 的感觉


若真的要说degree,因该是说suffrage 成功与否的degree,而不是suffrage 到底represented a period of DECLINE 的degree 吧! suffrage 到底有多么的represent他在1920的decline 实在说不通啊!


24#
发表于 2005-10-24 18:08:00 | 只看该作者

up up!!


我还是坚持我的想法,要视c对的话,不就表示作者还是认定suffrage在1992 市decline的吗?


degree to which the 1920's represented a period of decline for the feminist movement. 表示市decline地degree而以椰。。。


不赞成

25#
发表于 2005-11-7 21:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ayang1017在2005-9-29 17:04:00的发言:


关键在于提干中disagree的态度,全文的态度只有在三段中出现小的负态度,所以只能去那里了。忍不住说一句真是个n题,变相的主旨还告诉你按照细节来做~~~

   


我觉得这题并没有提示按细节去做的嫌疑。可能还是在阅读上有点误解。题目只是问作者与在文中6~7行提到的“新学者”在哪方面产生分歧,(很明显二者观点不同),但没有暗示6~7行就有这些新学者的观点,具体他们的观点是什么要基于对文章结构的把握来找。而第二段才正式提出他们的观点的,且第三段又很好的从作者角度针对于此提出反驳。


所以,做题是要认真审题啊,不然一点理解的偏差就会影响正确率!

26#
发表于 2005-12-26 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ethyl在2005-8-15 21:50:00的发言:


第一段赞扬
第二段小转,即使是赞扬的人也承认有decline
第三段作者观点,转折decline,赞扬赞扬。


不同意。。。




我也不同意,我觉得C错的,作者In some ways, however, these scholars still present the 1920’s as a period of decline.


从这句话可以看出作者不同意新学者关于decline的说法,但C选项的degree变成了作者同意decline的说法,只不过认为decline没有新学者说得那么严重罢了,和原文的意思不符合啊!


我觉得还是D更好点。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-26 15:35:50编辑过]
27#
发表于 2006-4-16 13:06:00 | 只看该作者

D is the right.


It is talking about the degree.

28#
发表于 2006-8-22 23:20:00 | 只看该作者

by fem-

 (30)     inist reformers: little could be seen in

the way of legislative victories.

During this decade, however, there

            was intense activism aimed at achiev-

ing increased autonomy for women,

 (35)
               broadening the spheres within which

they lived their daily lives.  Women’s

organizations worked to establish

opportunities for women

they strove to

           secure for women the full entitlements

 (40)    of citizenship, including the right to hold

office and the right to serve on juries

作者应该不满的是新学者认为女权改革者在立法上没什么作为。

于是作者在第三段举了绿色标注的几点与立法有关的例子。

应该选D.

they strove to

           secure for women the full entitlements

 (40)    of citizenship, including the right to hold

office and the right to serve on juries

作者应该不满的是新学者认为女权改革者在立法上没什么作为。

于是作者在第三段举了绿色标注的几点与立法有关的例子。

应该选D.

29#
发表于 2006-9-18 17:20:00 | 只看该作者

这道题真的很绕,题目问的是作者不同意 new scholarship的什么观点,答案应该是从new scholarship的观点去找,正如C答案所说,new scholarship是同意decline的。但是第三段说明了作者是不同意dicline的!所以答案是C。

30#
发表于 2006-11-5 15:37:00 | 只看该作者
i agree with C for the author mentioned in the passage that

 In some ways, however, these

scholars still present the 1920’s as a

 (25)      period of decline.  After suffrage, they

argue, the feminist movement lost its

cohesiveness, and gender conscious-

ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few

successes could be claimed by fem-

 (30)      inist reformers: little could be seen in

the way of legislative victories.

 

However, show s that the author is not in agreeement with the new scholarship.

 

Plus, "STILL :demonstrates that the author is not  in support of the position of the new scholarship

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-14 14:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部