ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zj1983
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd11-36

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-7-4 03:02:00 | 只看该作者

哪位NN能翻译一下这篇文章?



我怎么没看出来有赞扬?

我感觉整篇都是说不好,没达到目标之类的?



多谢!

12#
发表于 2005-7-9 19:31:00 | 只看该作者

Recent feminist scholarship con-


       cerning the United States in the 1920’s


       challenges earlier interpretations that


Line       assessed the twenties in terms of the


  (5)      unkept “promises” of the women’s


suffrage movement.



Asked whether


women’s suffrage was a failure, these


scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-


(20)      century social reformer Jane Addams,


       “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in


       general is failing?”


这两句话到底啥意思啊


unkept到底啥意思啊


NN帮忙啊!!!

13#
发表于 2005-7-10 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

Recent feminist scholarship con-cerning the United States in the 1920’s challenges earlier interpretations that assessed the twenties in terms of the unkept “promises” of the women’s suffrage movement.
近期关于美国20年代的妇女研究对早先的解释进行置疑。这些解释以妇女选举权运动未能履行承诺来评价20年代。


Asked whether women’s suffrage was a failure, these scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-century social reformer Jane Addams,“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in general is failing?”
在疑问该运动是否失败时,这些学者引用了世纪初的社会改革者J.A.的话“为什么不问一下整个选举权运动是否失败了呢?”


我觉得,还是要一句句把文章读懂。

14#
发表于 2005-7-11 11:01:00 | 只看该作者

unkept:   unkeep--->unkept


是这个吗?

15#
发表于 2005-8-5 08:59:00 | 只看该作者
36题还是不理解, 文章一段说新观点是说suffrage没有decline, 三段也是在用事实论证, 哪里来的什么作者disagree啊? 不理解, 想破头也不理解, NN解释一下吧!!!
16#
发表于 2005-8-6 22:35:00 | 只看该作者

看六楼的GG说的文章结构再通读一遍,应该可以明白了!


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=25&id=89814&star=1#1185201

17#
发表于 2005-8-15 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

第一段赞扬
第二段小转,即使是赞扬的人也承认有decline
第三段作者观点,转折decline,赞扬赞扬。


不同意。。。




18#
发表于 2005-8-26 12:54:00 | 只看该作者

It is very vague for question 36. I actually cannot see any opinion from the author him/herself except the very dubious quote on "promise".


I personally think it is a poor question of 36.

19#
发表于 2005-8-30 19:18:00 | 只看该作者

Q36:


It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the


              



  1. degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
  2. degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
  3. degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
  4. degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
  5. accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved

我选C,第三段都在谈C这个问题啊!


有人选E,请指正!



關於這裡我實在不太理解


沒錯第三段是在表述是否decline的問題


也是作者的重心


可是題目不是在問作者對line 5-6 new scholarship的觀點差異嗎???


E是錯在accuracy????


20#
发表于 2005-8-31 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

In some ways, however, these scholars still present the 1920’s as a  period of decline.  
这里是作者和新学者的差异之处。


After suffrage, they argue, the feminist movement lost its cohesiveness, and gender conscious-ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few successes could be claimed by feminist reformers: little could be seen in the way of legislative victories.
这是新学者的观点。


      During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achieving increased autonomy for women,  broadening the spheres within which they lived their daily lives.
第三段是作者提出的异议。


总之,C是文章的核心论题。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 14:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部