| 楼上的mm,文中虽然有提到negative effect, 但是没有继续,而是说non-economic 必须被考虑,紧接着one of such factors is blablabal.... yet recent research has shown that the
 
 actual economic effects of downsizing 
 (15)      are often negative for firms.  Thus,
 
 organization theory cannot adequately 
 explain downsizing;non-economic
 
 factors must also be considered. 
 One such factor is the evolution of 
 (20)      downsizing into a powerful business
 
        myth:  managers simply believe that 
        downsizing is efficacious.  Moreover, 
 downsizing nowadays is greeted 
 favorably by the business press; the 
 (25)      press often refers to soaring stock
 
 prices of downsizing firms (even though 
 research shows that stocks usually 
 rise only briefly after downsizing and 
 then suffer a prolonged decline). 
 (30)      Once viewed as a sign of desperation,
 
 downsizing is now viewed as a signal 
 that firms are serious about competing 
        in the global marketplace; such signals 
 are received positively by key actors— 
 (35)    financial analysts, consultants,
 
 shareholders—who supply firms with 
 vital organizing resources.  Thus, even 
 if downsizers do not become economi- 
       cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic 
 (40)     properties give them added prestige
 
 in the business community, enhancing 
 their survival prospects. |