| 
 The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged 
 by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was 
 A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès 
 B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers 
 C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time 
 D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists 
 E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy 
 这题的答案为什么是D呢?并没有warranted啊 
 This question remains 
 (60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence 
 into account, one cannot make 
 a definitive statement about dinosaur 
 physiology on the basis of dinosaur 
 bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an 
 (65) intermediate pattern of bone structure 
 because their physiology was neither 
 typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian. 
   
 我选E。其实我自己觉得E也不是很好,只是不知道到底应该选哪个。 |