SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】（六）Weaken

sdcar2010

能不能问个很傻的问题，具体什么叫做Must-Be-True type of question？
谢谢

-- by 会员 桃夭靥 (2012/1/14 20:36:54)

Given a simulus or passage, without ANY outside or extra information, the correct answer choice must be true according to the simulus or passage. It includes: must be true; assumption; main point; point at issue; method of reasoning; and flaw in the reasoning.

The wrong answer choice includes: could be true, not true according to the stimulus/passage.

桃夭靥

(⊙v⊙)嗯，谢谢你，您就是传说中的神吧。。。。。。。。。

xiaoliupao

This is a tough CR question. The key is analyzing the two possible choices in the backdrops of the question prompt.

B) says that even if the currency is weakened, the export will not increase because the manufacture industry reaches its top. So B) efinitely weakens the politician's argument.

E) points out an alternative way of increasing export. But it does not refute the politician's argument that devalue the currency will increase export. The politician's argument still holds.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/7/2 9:43:53)

[/quote]

When I was analyzing the choice E, I thought it fit the situation, which you mentioned in the main body, that C causes B. Is it because the word STRONGEST in prompt?  if so, what should I do when I encounter this kind of question again? thanks!

泾渭不凡

先顶出来饭饭好一边学一遍笔记哇~~

sdcar你好嘛？？最近想饭饭没哇？？？O(∩_∩)O哈哈~~~~

开玩笑哇~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

泾渭不凡

weaken~

常见削弱题提示语：weaken, attack, call into question, cast doubt on, challenge, contradict, counter, damage, rebut, refute, undermine.

选择答案之前准备：
      1、准确找出结论。
      2、找出题中前提假设。不要妄自添加假设前提。
      3、寻找逻辑链条薄弱处。
           （1）不合理假设
                        例子：
premise: The proposed law will give ordinary citizens a fair chance to keep an eye on and more control over when and how elected officials receive gifts and benefits from lobbyists.
conclusion: We should support it.
prephrase: Some statements undermine the unreasonable premise that “giving ordinary citizens a fair chance to keep an eye on and more control” is good.

            （2）采纳样本不具代表性
                            例子：亮了~
premise: Over two-thirds of students in Fudan University said that they would vote for him.
conclusion:Mr Xi will likely become the next President.
prephrase: These students cannot represent fairly of the voters in the political process. These students don't have the right to elect the next President.
            （3）比较关系不合理（类比or对比）
                            例子：
                                  饭饭不会找了捏...........囧......................

             （4）结论不合理夸大前提假设
                            例子：
premise:Acupuncture has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke.
conclusion: Anyone who undergoes acupuncture treatment will not experience a stroke when they are older.
prephrase: 又亮啦~~~O(∩_∩)O哈哈~Do these words sound like a TV commercial? If you are good at CR, you can have a lot of funs to pick apart commercials in Chinese or English. 饭饭这里就不发挥啦~~

泾渭不凡

削弱题正确选项：
                      （1）提供新信息以削弱结论。
                                    栗子：
premise: Mr. Zhang has worked in banks in Wall Street.
conclusion:Mr. Zhang will be a good addition to our finance department.
                      （2）强加因果。。。。。。。因果倒置也算在内咯~~

泾渭不凡

介个学完了也要顶一下~~~

水风空落眼前花

好！

littleyya

做weaken分类去了~

812966141

牛人