ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3173|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-9 21:12:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year.  But that prediction would not have adversely(adv.逆地,反对地) affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?


(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value.
(E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.
这道题的题目怎么理解啊?第二句话,求解
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-10 00:35:42 | 只看该作者
If it were not for the government's budget deficit, the prediction would not have devalue the dollar.

So the deficit is the necessary condition for the devaluation of the dollar.

Back to the stimulus:
Premises:
1) The devaluation of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth
2) If there is no government's huge budget deficit,  the prediction alone will not affect the dollar devaluation.

Conclusion: government's huge budget deficit must be decreased to prevent future currency declines

Answer (D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value.

If D is true, then premise 2 is wrong since apparently the prediction alone can cause the devaluation.  So D weakens the argument and D is the anwer
板凳
发表于 2011-6-10 00:39:36 | 只看该作者
As to the concern about whether choice D attacks the premise, the explanation is the following:
D attacks the logic of premise 2, since the deficit is NOT the necessary condition for the devaluation of the dollar if D is right.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-10 22:34:17 | 只看该作者
呃,我水平比较差请问能不能帮我翻译一下 But that prediction would not have adversely(adv.逆地,反对地) affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.。中文,麻烦牛牛了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-10 22:44:56 | 只看该作者
谢谢!~
6#
发表于 2012-1-7 09:35:41 | 只看该作者
若非政府的巨额预算赤字,这一预测(指经济放缓的预测)本不应对美元有反向影响(指贬值),因此,必须削减政府预算赤字来避免未来的美元贬值

大概是这个意思
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-29 20:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部