ChaseDream
搜索
12345
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: coolgirl
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 2-35

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2006-9-6 12:31:00 | 只看该作者
EDDC
42#
发表于 2006-12-9 10:36:00 | 只看该作者

有点疑问:

Q5:我的答案是

C.  defend certain business practices in light of criticism of corporations, actions

in a recent past

基于最后一段的描述

Employees could probably cope effectively with changes in the psychological contract if organizations were more forthright about how they were changing it.  But the euphemistic jargon used by executives to justify the changes they were implementing frequently backfires。

如果选择E的话似乎最后一段在文中作用就不大了,请NN指正

Employees could probably cope effectively with changes in the psychological contract if organizations were more forthright about how they were changing it.  But the euphemistic jargon used by executives to justify the changes they were implementing frequently backfires。

如果选择E的话似乎最后一段在文中作用就不大了,请NN指正

43#
发表于 2007-10-1 15:31:00 | 只看该作者

my answer: 5:E, 6,7, 8:C

44#
发表于 2007-11-7 13:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eSpirit在2005-3-24 22:23:00的发言:

I totally agree with you except question 6, which I choosed
                    E
. I believe that the reason in option D is a economic reason to shift to new relations, but not a legitimate reason. This can be confirmed by the phrase "significant financial losses" in D. The argument in the context said "top management is under pressure, resulting in increases in layoffs", Let's suppose that the company layed off some workers from the company's headcount, these layoffs will go to court if the compensation package is not good enough or the management can not give persuant reasons for their layoff action. That means these are actual legitimate reason for the organization.

Comments?


E不对,new technology无关

45#
发表于 2008-1-1 17:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aircavalry在2007-11-7 13:57:00的发言:

E不对,new technology无关

E is correct. If the new tech will be introduced, then some workers might be laid off because they r not needed. But employers don't want to face such a situation in which they might be sued by the discharged employees. So they change to the new employee-employer relationship, i.e. they prefer hiring

"temporary, contract, and leased employees in order to distance themselves from  potential litigation problems"                 

D is more financially related reason though it's also possible that some workers will have to be laid off under the financial pressure. But E is more directly related to the legal issues.

46#
发表于 2009-12-24 11:28:01 | 只看该作者

有点疑问:

Q5:我的答案是

C.  defend certain business practices in light of criticism of corporations, actions

in a recent past

基于最后一段的描述Employees could probably cope effectively with changes in the psychological contract if organizations were more forthright about how they were changing it.  But the euphemistic jargon used by executives to justify the changes they were implementing frequently backfires。如果选择E的话似乎最后一段在文中作用就不大了,请NN指正

Employees could probably cope effectively with changes in the psychological contract if organizations were more forthright about how they were changing it.  But the euphemistic jargon used by executives to justify the changes they were implementing frequently backfires。

如果选择E的话似乎最后一段在文中作用就不大了,请NN指正
-- by 会员 albertwl (2006/12/9 10:36:00)


agree, can someone explain why not c?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 13:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部