og198,og200-两道than 补充句子的题目

aaaaaaaa

OG198

这道OG 198，如何还原than后省略的句子？？虽然答案说了为什么不选ABCD的理由，可是最有问题的就是E如何将than后面省略的句型补出 。

. Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

(E)for any previous campaign

OG200的E虽然是错误的，than 的比较级前后对比正确吗？？记得好像说过those 必须加of 修饰，但是这里没有of 好像也正确

The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place.

rt316

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

those of是所有格关系，这里的those that是定语修饰

aaaaaaaa

感谢NN

我爱欧洲

以下是引用rt316在2004-6-23 1:50:00的发言：

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

those of是所有格关系，这里的those that是定语修饰

不同意。省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出，既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢？

actu

我愛歐洲：

省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出，既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢？

我比較不同意，因為，這題是supplies和supplies的比較，所以，rt316說得對，還原後變成：

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than (supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

最多你可以說，......more supplies than supplies (that it had gathered) for...

這是省略的情形和og132(students), 187(Americans), 200(populations)的情形較為相似，亦即，名詞在泛稱的情況下可以省略，不會造成誤解。可以再研究、討論！

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-31 18:36:17编辑过]

ring_cheng

省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain…………

由此引出，既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢？

有一些不同意见，请继续讨论：

我认为这里的it had had for ...应该是承前省略，省略的动词部分应该与前面的谓语动词一致，即 it had had entered Russia。可是这里要表达的意思是以前的supply与这次的supply之间的比较，补出had had反而好像不能清楚地表达比较对象吧（比较的对象是状语中的主体词而不是主语）？

actu

同意ring_cheng

我爱欧洲

198OG是这样说的啊，从句中要用过去完成时（the verb of that clause will need to be in the past perfect form）所以had entered 省略为had had.

lindazhou

B 是怎么排除的？

brissa

以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-5-31 17:54:00的发言：

省略部分我觉得是Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than it had had for any previous campain????lt;/STRONG>

由此引出，既然时态不同为什么可以省略呢？

有一些不同意见，请继续讨论：

我认为这里的it had had for ...应该是承前省略，省略的动词部分应该与前面的谓语动词一致，即 it had had entered Russia。可是这里要表达的意思是以前的supply与这次的supply之间的比较，补出had had反而好像不能清楚地表达比较对象吧（比较的对象是状语中的主体词而不是主语）？

黄线部分的叫什么时态啊？只听说有had entered或had been entered, 哪有had had entered的呀，是我晕了吗？

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-11 23:07:00编辑过]